The effect of GASING with teaching at the right level on third-grade students' critical thinking in addition

Journal of Educational and Learning Studies October 21, 2026 Volume 9, Number 2 3 authors

Abstract

Critical thinking remains a fundamental competency that has yet to be optimally developed in elementary mathematics education, particularly when instructional approaches fail to account for differences in students’ cognitive readiness. This study aims to examine the effect of integrating the GASING method (GAmpang, aSyIk, nyeNGkan) with Teaching at the Right Level (TaRL) on the critical thinking skills of third-grade elementary school students in addition learning. A quasi-experimental design with a non-equivalent control group was employed, involving 88 students divided into a control group (n = 43), which received GASING instruction, and an experimental group (n = 45), which received instruction integrating GASING and TaRL. Critical thinking skills were assessed based on students’ abilities to analyze quantitative relationships, justify mathematical reasoning, and evaluate problem-solving strategies using an eight-item analytical rubric with a maximum score of 24. Before the intervention, both groups had relatively comparable baseline scores, as indicated by the Welch’s t-test (t(78.85) = 1.445; p = 0.152). Improvements in critical thinking skills (Gain_CT) were analyzed using an independent-samples t-test after testing for normality using the Shapiro–Wilk test and homogeneity of variance using Levene’s test. The results showed that the experimental group achieved a significantly higher mean improvement than the control group (M = 44.60 vs. M = 24.65; t (86) = −4.640; p < 0.001; Cohen’s d = 0.99), indicating a large effect size. These findings suggest that structured, reasoning-oriented instruction combined with ability-based cognitive differentiation can support the development of critical thinking skills among students with diverse ability levels. This study provides empirical evidence of the importance of diagnostic assessment as a foundation for designing elementary mathematics instruction and highlights the potential of adaptive learning in developing higher-order thinking skills.

Authors

  1. Yohana Christina Rahangmetan

    Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

  2. Tita Mulyati

    Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

  3. Rendi Restiana Sukardi

    Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Keywords

Critical thinkingGasing methodTeaching at the right levelMathematical summationElementary school

References

  1. Aktoprak, A., & Hursen, C. (2022). A Bibliometric and Content Analysis of Critical Thinking In Primary Education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101029
  2. Alfageh, D. H., York, C. S., Hodge-Zickerman, A., & Xie, Y. (2024). Elementary teachers’ use of adaptive diagnostic assessment to improve mathematics teaching and learning: A case study. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/14190
  3. Ashirimbetova, M., Shayakhmetova, D., & Davis, B. M. (2024). Promoting HOTs through Cognitive Strategies: A Case of Kazakhstani Pre-Service Teachers. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 14(5), 127–141. https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2024-0126
  4. Banerjee, A., Banerji, R., Berry, J., Duflo, E., Kannan, H., & ... (2016). Mainstreaming an effective intervention: Evidence from randomized evaluations of “Teaching at the Right Level” in India. nber.org. https://www.nber.org/papers/w22746
  5. Bekbayeva, Z. S., Solovyev, A. N., Chechetkina, N. V., Bolshakov, A. A., & Sosina, L. V. (2022). Problems of Organizing Critical Thinking Training for University Students. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 22(10), 116–123. https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v22i10.5390
  6. Cahyaningsih, U., & Nahdi, D. S. (2021). The Effect of Realistic Mathematics Education on Elementary Students’ Critical Thinking Skills. In Mujiarto null, Djohar A., Vaidyanathan S., Bin Mamat M., Lien C.-H., Habib M.M., Sulaema E., Suswandari null, Muhtadi null, Sarjito null, Komaro M., Hermawan S., Tjahjanti P.H., Kautsar I.A., Saputra J., Sambas A., & Hendrawan B. (Eds.), J. Phys. Conf. Ser. (Vol. 1764, Issue 1). IOP Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1764/1/012127
  7. Christinove, R. M., & Rosyida, I. (2022). Student’s mathematical refractive thinking skills in research based -learning reviewed from adversity quotient. In Samsudin A., Hasanah L., Yuliani G., Iryanti M., Kasi Y.F., Shidiq A.S., & Rusyati L. (Eds.), AIP Conf. Proc. (Vol. 2468). American Institute of Physics Inc. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0103045
  8. Drenoyianni, H., & Kourtis, P. (2024). Investigating the development of higher order thinking in an elementary classroom: Results from a mixed methods study. Education 3-13, 52(8), 1353–1371. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2022.2148486
  9. Evans, P., & Martin, A. J. (2023). Load reduction instruction: Multilevel effects for motivation, engagement, and achievement in mathematics. Educational Psychology, 43(10), 1125–1143. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2023.2290442
  10. Hartono, M., Kurniawan, W. R., & Wijayanti, D. G. S. (2025). Implementing TaRL in physical education: Mastering specific skills in soccer games for junior high school students. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 44(1), 156–168. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v44i1.78524
  11. Herlambang, Y. T., Abidin, Y., Hendriyani, A., Putra, Y. P., Supriatna, J., & Hendrawan, B. (2022). Peningkatan Literasi Digital Melalui Kegiatan Workshop Online Internet-Sentrisme Bagi Guru Sekolah Dasar. Massagi: Masyarakat Multiliterasi Pedagogi, 1(2).
  12. Ismail, R., Retnawati, H., & Imawan, O. R. (2024). Construct validity of mathematics high order thinking skills instrument with cultural context: Confirmatory factor analysis. In Masseran N., Ishak A.M., Ismail E.S., Tajuddin R.R.M., Chien L.K., Ismail N., & Burhanuddin N.A. (Eds.), AIP Conf. Proc. (Vol. 3150, Issue 1). American Institute of Physics. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0228143
  13. Kaffenberger, M. (2021). Modelling the long-run learning impact of the Covid-19 learning shock: Actions to (more than) mitigate loss. International Journal of Educational Development, (Query date: 2025-11-07 06:56:57). https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0738059320304855
  14. Kantar, L. D., Ezzeddine, S., & Rizk, U. (2020). Rethinking clinical instruction through the zone of proximal development. Nurse Education Today, 95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104595
  15. Kharisudin, I., & Ardiansyah, A. S. (2021). Factors of inhibit the mathematical critical thinking process of junior high school students. J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 1918(4). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1918/4/042056
  16. Lamaizi, E. M., Zraoula, L., & Wahbi, B. E. (2024). The Impact of TaRL Approach on Learning Convergence of Numerical Sequences: A Case Study in the Moroccan Educational Context. Mathematics Teaching-Research Journal, 16(5), 265–280.
  17. Machkour, M., Gharbaoui, H., Lamalif, L., Faris, S., & Mansouri, K. (2026). Synergy between explicit teaching, ICT integration, and the TaRL approach: Structural modeling of learning gains. Frontiers in Education, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1742242
  18. Muharram, M. R. W., Herman, T., & Mufliva, R. (2025). Mathematical mindset, critical thinking skills, and productive struggle in learning mathematics in elementary school. AIP Conf. Proc., 3316(1). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0290170
  19. Mustafa, S., Riana, R., Baharullah, B., & Maming, K. (2024). The Collaboration of Teaching at the Right Level Approach with Problem-Based Learning Model. Open Education Studies, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/edu-2024-0046
  20. Narváez, R., Torres, M. D., & Cañadas, M. C. (2026). Analyzing the Generalization Process of Fourth Graders in a Functional Thinking Context. In Abreu A., Carvalho J.V., & Castanho R.A. (Eds.), Lect. Notes Networks Syst.: 1695 LNNS (pp. 230–237). Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-09074-4_23
  21. Patel, D., & Alismail, A. (2024). Relationship Between Cognitive Load Theory, Intrinsic Motivation and Emotions in Healthcare Professions Education: A Perspective on the Missing Link. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 15, 57–62. https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S441405
  22. Ponmani, M., & Geetha, R. (2022). Integration of Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) and ICTs in Language Learning. In Contemporary ELT Strategies in Engineering Pedagogy: Theory and Practice (pp. 237–252). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003268529-20
  23. Pratiwi, D. D., Andriani, S., Kuswanto, C. W., & Utami, E. (2021). Application of algebraic tile media with gasing: Ability to understand mathematical concepts and student creativity. In Pane E., Saregar A., & Deta U.A. (Eds.), IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. (Vol. 1796, Issue 1). IOP Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1796/1/012023
  24. Rafiki, R., Herlambang, Y. T., Hendrawan, B., Sutini, A., Putra, Y. P., & Wahid, R. (2025). Acceptability of the “Dasunse” website-based learning media with the Merdeka Learning Pathway in elementary schools across West Java. Journal of Future Education, 3(1), 1–8.
  25. Rahangmetan, Y. C., Herlambang, Y. T., & Darmawan, D. (2026). Systematic Literature Review: Peran Metode Gasing Dalam Mendorong Pendidikan Kritis Transformatif di Sekolah Dasar. Naturalistic: Jurnal Kajian Penelitian dan Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 10(2), 125–131. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35568/naturalistic.v10i2.7008
  26. Rahmawati, O. M., Oktaviani, A. M., & Wijaya, S. (2024). Analysis of the Effectiveness of the Teaching at the Right Level (TaRL) Approach in Improving Students’ Literacy Skills through the 15-Minute Literacy Program at Primary School. Edunesia : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 5(3), 1575–1592. https://doi.org/10.51276/edu.v5i3.1051
  27. Ramdhani, S., Nurcahyono, N. A., & Nirmala, S. D. (2025). Designing Interactive E-Modules Based on Differentiated Instruction and the Theory of Didactical Situations for Primary Mathematics Education. Educational Process: International Journal, 17. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2025.17.368
  28. Ramlawati, R., Sari, N. I., Kusumawati, R., Yesin, M., Ilmi, N., & Arsyad, A. A. (2025). The Effect of Differentiated Science Inquiry Learning Model Based on Teaching at the Right Level on Students’ Critical Thinking and Science Process Skills. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v14i1.19479
  29. Rebello, N. S., Munsell, J., Chandran, P., Loschk, L. C., Huang, Y., Hoai, M., & D’mello, S. (2024). Mapping students’ self-reported cognitive load, situational engagement, and attentional-cognitive states in an online multimedia learning module. In Ryan Q.X., Pawl A., & Zwolak J.P. (Eds.), Phys. Educ. Res. Conf. Proc. (pp. 354–360). American Association of Physics Teachers. https://doi.org/10.1119/perc.2024.pr.Rebello
  30. Rezeki, S., Putra, Y. P., & Wahid, R. (2026). Implementation of Religious Habits in Forming the Religious Character of Elementary Madrasah Students. Journal of Future Education, 3(2), 24-31.
  31. Sari, N. I., Kusumawati, R., Yesin, M., Ilmi, N., & Arsyad, A. A. (2025). The Effect of Differentiated Science Inquiry Learning Model Based on Teaching at The Right Level on Students’ Critical Thinking and Science Process Skills. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 14(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v14i1.19479
  32. Sidik, G. S., Antiya, T., Zahrah, R. F., Apriani, I. F., & Salimi, M. (2025). What Are the Learning Obstacles in Students’ Algebraic Thinking During the Introduction of Plane Geometry Material? Salud, Ciencia y Tecnologia, 5. https://doi.org/10.56294/saludcyt20251160
  33. Taufik, A. (2024). Implementasi Metode Matematika Gasing Dalam Meningkatkan Daya Berpikir Kritis Siswa Kelas Iii Di Sdn Telagawaru. BEGIBUNG: Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin, 2(6), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.62667/begibung.v2i6.171
  34. Thompson, W. J., & Clark, A. K. (2024). Improving Instructional Decision-Making Using Diagnostic Classification Models. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 43(4), 146–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12619
  35. Trisnani, N., Retnawati, H., & Wuryandani, W. (2024). Challenges of Indonesian elementary school mathematics teachers in integrating critical thinking into the classroom. Journal on Mathematics Education, 15(3), 905–924. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v15i3.pp905-924
  36. Walidainismawati, N., Winarni, R., & Yamtinah, S. (2021). Analysis of Students’ Critical Thinking Skills in Solving Math Essay Problems Using Think-Aloud Protocol Strategy in Elementary Schools. ACM Int. Conf. Proc. Ser. Scopus. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series. https://doi.org/10.1145/3516875.3516889
  37. Waluya, S. B., Junaedi, I., & Dewi, N. R. (2024). Teachers’ perceptions of critical thinking and mathematical literacy in main school PISA 2022 regional survey Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, 8(6), 2346–2353. https://doi.org/10.55214/25768484.v8i6.2479
  38. Wilkins, B. (2025). Using diagnostic assessments to improve data use. Phi Delta Kappan, 106(7–8), 34–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/00317217251342367
  39. Zhang, W., Wang, Y., Yang, L., & Wang, C. (2020). Suspending classes without stopping learning: China’s education emergency management policy in the COVID-19 Outbreak. Journal of Risk and Financial …, (Query date: 2025-11-07 06:56:57). https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/13/3/55