Implementing gamification-based training for sustainable agriculture: The “Tani Cerdas” application for women farmer groups

Journal of Educational and Learning Studies November 03, 2026 Volume 9, Number 2 3 authors

Abstract

This study examined the implementation, user acceptance, and perceived learning benefits of a gamification-based agricultural training application for Women Farmers’ Groups (WFGs). An ADDIE-based research and development approach was employed, focusing on implementation and evaluation. Thirty WFG members in Bejiharjo Village, Indonesia, participated in blended learning activities. Data were collected through questionnaires and interviews, guided by Kirkpatrick and CIPP evaluation frameworks, and analyzed descriptively and thematically. Participants reported favorable application usability, with mean scores of 4.55 for navigation, 4.45 for instructional clarity, and 4.35 for visual presentation. All indicators exceeded 4.00 on a five-point scale. Participants perceived improvements in agricultural understanding and readiness to explore sustainable practices. The application demonstrated promising acceptance and potential for supporting non-formal agricultural education. However, self-reported outcomes and the absence of a comparison group limit effectiveness claims, requiring further objective and longitudinal evaluation.

Authors

  1. Adin Ariyanti Dewi

    Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

  2. Iis Prasetyo

    Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

  3. Mareta Puspita

    Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Keywords

GamificationWomen Farmer GroupDigital TrainingSustainable AgricultureTani Cerdas

References

  1. Adyaputra, R., Imtihan, K., & Saleh, M. (2025). Assessing user satisfaction of local government websites through ISO 25010 and Technology Acceptance Model (TAM): A SmartPLS and IPMA-based study in Lombok Tengah. Journal of Information and Organizational Sciences, 49(2), 291–312.
  2. Altieri, M. A. (2018). Agroecology: The science of sustainable agriculture (3rd ed.). CRC Press.
  3. Balci, S., & Morris, B. J. (2026). How do badges and freedom of choice affect intrinsic motivation, psychological need satisfaction and performance of online learners? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. Advance online publication.
  4. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice Hall.
  5. Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach. Springer.
  6. Carroll, C., Patterson, M., Wood, S., Booth, A., Rick, J., & Balain, S. (2007). A conceptual framework for implementation fidelity. Implementation Science, 2, 40.
  7. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. Harper & Row.
  8. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.
  9. Davis, K., Ekboir, J., Mekasha, W., Ochieng, C., Spielman, D. J., & Zerfu, E. (2018). Strengthening agricultural education and training in Sub-Saharan Africa. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability.
  10. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Press.
  11. Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining gamification. Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference.
  12. Food and Agriculture Organization. (2017). The future of food and agriculture: Trends and challenges. FAO.
  13. Fullan, M. (2016). The new meaning of educational change (5th ed.). Teachers College Press.
  14. Gagné, R. M. (1985). The conditions of learning and theory of instruction (4th ed.). Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
  15. Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., & Sarsa, H. (2014). Does gamification work? A literature review of empirical studies. Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
  16. Ife, J., & Tesoriero, F. (2016). Community development: Community-based alternatives in an age of globalisation (4th ed.). Pearson Education.
  17. Kirkpatrick, J. D., & Kirkpatrick, W. K. (2016). Kirkpatrick’s four levels of training evaluation. ATD Press.
  18. Knowles, M. S., Holton, E. F., & Swanson, R. A. (2015). The adult learner (8th ed.). Routledge.
  19. Kolb, D. A. (2015). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development (2nd ed.). Pearson Education.
  20. Landers, R. N. (2014). Developing a theory of gamified learning. Simulation & Gaming, 45(6), 752–768.
  21. Merriam, S. B., & Bierema, L. L. (2014). Adult learning: Linking theory and practice. Jossey-Bass.
  22. Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. Jossey-Bass.
  23. Pretty, J. (2002). Agri-culture: Reconnecting people, land and nature. Earthscan.
  24. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
  25. Stufflebeam, D. L., & Zhang, G. (2017). The CIPP evaluation model: How to evaluate for improvement and accountability. Guilford Press.
  26. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.
  27. Werbach, K., & Hunter, D. (2012). For the win: How game thinking can revolutionize your business. Wharton Digital Press.
  28. Wolfert, S., Ge, L., Verdouw, C., & Bogaardt, M. J. (2017). Big data in smart farming: A review. Agricultural Systems, 153, 69–80.
  29. Zimmerman, M. A. (1995). Psychological empowerment: Issues and illustrations. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23(5), 581–599.