Implementation of employment contracts in business law practice: a doctrinal analysis after constitutional court decision no. 168/PUU-XXI/2023

Lentera Negeri November 04, 2026 Volume 7, Number 1 2 authors

Abstract

This study analyzes how employment contracts should be formed, performed, and adapted in Indonesian business law practice after Constitutional Court Decision No. 168/PUU-XXI/2023. It uses doctrinal (normative juridical) legal research with statute, case, and conceptual approaches. The primary legal materials are the Civil Code, Law No. 13 of 2003 on Manpower, Law No. 6 of 2023, Government Regulation No. 35 of 2021, and the Court decision. The secondary materials are 35 journal articles published in 2021–2025. The materials were analyzed through systematic interpretation, a before-and-after comparison of the norms changed by the decision, and a thematic synthesis of the literature under three categories: validity, performance, and legal certainty. The analysis yields three findings. First, contract validity operates on two layers, because Article 1320 of the Civil Code must be read together with mandatory labor norms. Second, the decision changes five clause-level checkpoints: fixed-term duration, written Indonesian form, outsourcing scope, weekly rest, and wages and termination. Third, the literature explains the gap between contract text and practice through flexible rules, unclear worker status, limited worker understanding, and slow enforcement. The study proposes a contract-lifecycle compliance framework covering formation, performance, adaptation, and dispute, and notes that field validation through interviews remains a task for further research.

Authors

  1. Kavita Nur Saidah

    University of Semarang

  2. Zaenal Arifin

    University of Semarang

Keywords

Employment contractBusiness lawLegal certainty

References

  1. Adhawiyah, N. F., & Santoso, I. B. (2022). Penyelesaian perselisihan hubungan industrial dalam pemenuhan hak pekerja yang diputus hubungan kerja. The Juris, 6(2), 502–510. https://doi.org/10.56301/juris.v6i2.623
  2. Aprilia, N. P., & Wibawa, K. C. S. (2021). Prospectus of salary/wage subsidy policy for worker welfare improvement during Covid-19 pandemic. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v9i3.899
  3. Estiwardani, F. (2025). The impact of Constitutional Court Decision No. 168/PUU-XXI/2023 on the employment cluster in the Job Creation Law: Implications for the use of foreign workers in national strategic projects. Jurnal Daulat Hukum, 8(2), 239–250. https://doi.org/10.30659/jdh.v8i2.44863
  4. Fauzi, A. (2025). Kepastian hukum bagi pekerja dalam perjanjian kerja waktu tertentu pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 168/PUU-XXI/2023. SAINMIKUM, 2(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.60126/sainmikum.v2i1.786
  5. Gunadi, A., Johan, S., & Sudiro, A. (2022). Between the Job Creation Act and Labor Act: What’s specific time employee agreement (PKWT)? Nagari Law Review, 5(2), 160–170. https://nalrev.fhuk.unand.ac.id/index.php/nalrev/article/view/297
  6. Hadi, S. P., Hamdani, R. S., & Roziqin, A. (2023). A sustainability review on the Indonesian job creation law. Heliyon, 9(2), e13431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13431
  7. Hasanah, S. S., & Sulistina, S. (2025). Perlindungan hukum terhadap kesejahteraan pekerja pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 168/PUU-XXI/2023. AHKAM, 4(4), 1252–1263. https://doi.org/10.58578/ahkam.v4i4.7628
  8. Hidayah, N. P., Cloet, Q. R., & Pradhan, D. (2021). The implementation of labor development principles according to Job Creation Law as a reason to protect wages rights. Bestuur, 9(1), 68–76. https://doi.org/10.20961/bestuur.v9i1.49252
  9. Hidayati, L. N., Dewi, A. L., Oktaviana, M. M., Sari, L., Salsabila, S. R., & Hadji, K. (2025). Perlindungan hukum pekerja kontrak dalam perspektif Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 dan Undang-Undang Omnibus Law. Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum, 3(3), 1934–1945. https://doi.org/10.61104/alz.v3i3.1484
  10. Iqbal, M., Mujib, M. M., & Lestari, Y. (2022). Does omnibus law affect the Indonesian investment regulations towards Chinese investors? Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi, 5(2), 179–197. https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v5i2.6838
  11. Izzati, N. R. (2022). Deregulation in Job Creation Law: The future of Indonesian labor law. Padjadjaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 9(2), 191–209. https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v9n2.a3
  12. Kesuma, I., & Uwiyono, A. (2022). Outsourcing workers legal protection under the post validation of Job Creation Law. Unram Law Review, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.29303/ulrev.v6i1.220
  13. Kunarti, S., Hidayah, N. P., Hariyanto, H., & Ulum, M. B. (2024). The legal politics of outsourcing and its implication for the protection of workers in Indonesia. Sriwijaya Law Review, 8(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.28946/slrev.Vol8.Iss1.2750.pp1-19
  14. Laksana, W., & Fareha, N. (2025). The challenges of using the omnibus law method in Indonesia’s legal system. Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi, 8(2), 459–477. https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v8i2.13382
  15. Mahy, P. (2022). Indonesia’s Omnibus Law on Job Creation: Legal hierarchy and responses to judicial review in the labour cluster of amendments. Asian Journal of Comparative Law, 17(1), 51–75. https://doi.org/10.1017/asjcl.2022.7
  16. Mashari, M., & Suroto, S. (2022). Efektivitas eksekusi terhadap pengusaha yang tidak membayar pesangon pekerja di perusahaan. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 4(3), 459–470. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v4i3.459-470
  17. Negara, T. A. S. (2023). Normative legal research in Indonesia: Its origins and approaches. Audito Comparative Law Journal, 4(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.22219/aclj.v4i1.24855
  18. Noviana, E., Suriaatmadja, T. T., & Sundary, R. I. (2022). Asas keseimbangan dalam perjanjian kerja antara pekerja dan pengusaha dalam rangka mewujudkan keadilan bagi para pihak. Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika, 6(1), 84–100. https://doi.org/10.25072/jwy.v6i1.533
  19. Nugroho, A., Ronaboyd, I., Rusdiana, E., Prasetio, D. E., & Zulhuda, S. (2024). The impact of labor law reform on Indonesian workers: A comparative study after the Job Creation Law. Lex Scientia Law Review, 8(1), 65–106. https://doi.org/10.15294/lslr.v8i1.14064
  20. Padilah, M., Rahmatiar, Y., & Abas, M. (2024). Perlindungan hukum terhadap hak pekerja yang tidak dibayarkan dalam pemutusan hubungan kerja: Dalam perspektif hukum ketenagakerjaan. HUKMY: Jurnal Hukum, 4(2), 734–749. https://doi.org/10.35316/hukmy.2024.v4i2.734-749
  21. Perdana, S. (2021). Comparison of government efforts in improving the welfare of Indonesian workers based on Law Number 13 of 2003 concerning manpower and Draft Law Number 11 of 2020 concerning job creation. International Journal Reglement & Society, 2(1), 35–44. https://doi.org/10.55357/ijrs.v2i1.85
  22. Permana, D. Y. (2022). Implementasi perlindungan hukum terhadap pekerja di Indonesia dalam Perjanjian Kerja Waktu Tertentu (PKWT) dan Perjanjian Kerja Waktu Tidak Tertentu (PKWTT) menurut Undang-Undang No. 11 Tahun 2020 tentang Cipta Kerja. Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains, 3(5), 902–915. https://doi.org/10.59141/jiss.v3i05.626
  23. Purba, M. Y., Wijayati, A., & Nadapdap, B. (2024). Perlindungan hukum terhadap pekerja dalam Perjanjian Kerja Waktu Tertentu (PKWT) ditinjau dari Undang-Undang No. 6 Tahun 2023. Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.56338/jks.v7i4.4767
  24. Rifai, M. I., Fajarini, Y. E., Silaen, R., & Fitrianto, B. (2025). Kontrak kerja: Analisis hukum dan implementasi. Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora, 4(3), 912–919. https://doi.org/10.55606/jurrish.v4i3.6052
  25. Samadi, J. (2025). Analisis yuridis perlindungan hukum pekerja kontrak dalam sistem ketenagakerjaan Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Bisnis (J-Kumbis), 3(2). https://doi.org/10.37606/j-kumbis.v3i2.329
  26. Sarjana, I. M., Sudiarawan, K. A., Medd, L. A., Raksita, I. P. B. W., & Hermanto, B. (2023). Omnibus law employment cluster: Is it a form of labor exploitation in the Indonesian context? UUM Journal of Legal Studies, 14(1), 57–88. https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls2023.14.1.3
  27. Siahaan, Z. O. C., Tjoanda, M., & Pattipawae, D. R. (2024). Perlindungan hukum pekerja terhadap perjanjian kerja. TATOHI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 3(12). https://doi.org/10.47268/tatohi.v3i12.2110
  28. Sinaga, N. A., & Zaluchu, T. (2023). Perlindungan hukum hak-hak pekerja dalam hubungan ketenagakerjaan di Indonesia. Jurnal Teknologi Industri, 6. https://doi.org/10.35968/jti.v6i0.754
  29. Sumertajaya, I. K. S. W., Dewi, K. A. P., Swetasoma, C. G., & Hutama, I. D. M. A. (2024). Implikasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 168/PUU-XXI/2023 terhadap Perjanjian Kerja Waktu Tertentu (PKWT). Jurnal Yustitia, 19(2), 30–41. https://doi.org/10.62279/yustitia.v19i2.1353
  30. Suryana, C. (2025). Konstitusionalitas pengutamaan tenaga kerja Indonesia pasca Putusan MK No. 168/PUU-XXI/2023: Implikasi hukum dan kebijakan ketenagakerjaan. Jurnal Litigasi, 26(1). https://doi.org/10.23969/litigasi.v26i1.22903
  31. Tobing, C. N. M., Ginting, S. B., & Melayu, H. A. (2023). Analysis of labor rights after the Job Creation Law in perspective of human rights. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 12(1), 97–128. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.12.1.2023.97-128
  32. Wardah, S. S. W. (2024). Protection of outsourced labor in the industrial relations system: A juridical analysis of the Job Creation Law. Jurnal Office, 10(2), 200–206. https://journal.unm.ac.id/index.php/jo/article/view/5316
  33. Wenang P., A. P., Siregar, A. A. N., Galag, C. P., Grace, & Sinaga, H. (2025). Specific time work agreement (PKWT) after the Constitutional Court ruling No. 168/PUU.XXI/2023, is it still relevant? Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.59141/jiss.v6i1.1584
  34. Wibowo, R. F., & Herawati, R. (2021). Perlindungan bagi pekerja atas tindakan pemutusan hubungan kerja (PHK) secara sepihak. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 3(1), 109–120. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v3i1.109-120
  35. Widyorini, S. R., & Tyaswati W. L., A. (2022). Work agreement on outsourcing system and legal protection for workers. International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences, 3(1), 484–499. https://doi.org/10.51601/ijersc.v3i1.300