The potential of interactive multimedia with contextual teaching and learning approaches in mathematics learning: a systematic literature review

Jurnal EDUCATIO: Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia October 01, 2024 Volume 10, Number 2 3 authors

Abstract

This study aims to determine the potential and characteristics of interactive multimedia with an effective Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) approach in elementary school mathematics learning through a Systematic Literature Review (SLR). A total of 18 relevant studies were analyzed in this study, which consisted of journal articles published in 2013-2023. Scientific journals or conference proceedings are used indexed by Scopus Q1-Q4. The exclusion criteria in this article are articles that do not have a complete structure, review articles or conceptual articles that do not report the results of empirical research. The results of the analysis show that interactive multimedia with the CTL approach has great potential in improving the learning outcomes, motivation, engagement, and understanding of mathematical concepts of elementary school students. CTL allows students to see how mathematical concepts can be applied in everyday life, making the learning process more relevant and engaging. Characteristics of interactive multimedia with an effective CTL approach include the use of rich and relevant visuals to real-world contexts, interactivity that allows active exploration, authentic presentation of problems, constructive feedback, scaffolding that suits the needs of students, and the integration of elements of art and aesthetics. The implementation of interactive multimedia with the CTL approach also has challenges, such as the availability of technology infrastructure and teacher competence. This study implies that teachers and researchers need to realize that the design and use of interactive multimedia with the CTL approach can effectively improve the quality of mathematics learning in elementary school.

Authors

  1. Khairunnisa Hanan Pratiwi

    Universitas Negeri Jakarta

  2. Robinson - Situmorang

    Universitas Negeri Jakarta

  3. Tuti Iriani

    Universitas Negeri Jakarta

Keywords

CTL approach Mathematics learning Systematic Literature Review

References

  1. Abdulrahaman, M. D., Faruk, N., Oloyede, A. A., Surajudeen-Bakinde, N. T., Olawoyin, L. A., Mejabi, O. V., Imam-Fulani, Y. O., Fahm, A. O., & Azeez, A. L. (2020). Multimedia tools in the teaching and learning processes: A systematic review. Heliyon, 6(11), e05312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05312
  2. Algers, A., Silva-Fletcher, A., Gregory, N., & Hunt, M. (2013). The development of a new methodology for knowledge sharing in the interface between university and society—An example from the meat sector. Meat Science, 95(3), 672–678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.04.060
  3. Arnindya Navitri Ainullah, I Nyoman Jampel, & I Gde Wawan Sudatha. (2023). Interactive Learning Multimedia with Problem-Based Learning for Fifth-Grade Elementary School Students. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar, 7(2), 316–326. https://doi.org/10.23887/jisd.v7i2.57377
  4. Asyaari, A. (2023). The Students Interest Related with Teacher Strategy: English. JOEY: Journal of English Ibrahimy, 2(2), 13–18. https://doi.org/10.35316/joey.2023.v2i2.13-18
  5. Benning, I., & Davis, E. K. (2023). Graduate students’ experiences and evaluation of online instruction. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 8(1), 100597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100597
  6. Beuchel, P., Groß Ophoff, J., Cramer, C., & Hautzinger, M. (2022). Promoting occupational health and teaching quality: The impact of a mindfulness intervention in teacher training. Teaching and Teacher Education, 114, 103703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103703
  7. Buchori, A. (2019). Pengembangan multimedia interaktif dengan pendekatan kontekstual untuk meningkatkan pemecahan masalah kemampuan matematika. Jurnal Inovasi Teknologi Pendidikan, 6(1), 104–115. https://doi.org/10.21831/jitp.v6i1.20094
  8. de Brito Lima, F., Lautert, S. L., & Gomes, A. S. (2022). Learner behaviors associated with uses of resources and learning pathways in blended learning scenarios. Computers & Education, 191, 104625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104625
  9. Fatayan, A., Safrul, S., Ghani, A. R. A., & Ayu, S. (2022). The Implementation of Problem-Based Learning on Multiplication and Division Lessons in Improving Elementary School Students’ Learning Motivation. JTAM (Jurnal Teori Dan Aplikasi Matematika), 6(4), 857. https://doi.org/10.31764/jtam.v6i4.9084
  10. Geni, K. H. Y. W., Sudarma, I. K., & Mahadewi, L. P. P. (2020). Pengembangan Multimedia Pembelajaran Interaktif Berpendekatan CTL Pada Pembelajaran Tematik Siswa Kelas IV SD. Jurnal Edutech Undiksha, 8(2), 1. https://doi.org/10.23887/jeu.v8i2.28919
  11. Hwang, W.-Y., Manabe, K., & Huang, T.-H. (2023). Collaborative guessing game for EFL learning with kinesthetic recognition. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 48, 101297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101297
  12. Kusumawati, L. D., Sugito, Nf., & Mustadi, A. (2021). Kelayakan multimedia pembelajaran interaktif dalam memotivasi siswa belajar matematika. Kwangsan: Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.31800/jtp.kw.v9n1.p31--51
  13. Liana, Y. R., & Nursuhud, P. I. (2020). Problem-Based Learning Approach with Supported Interactive Multimedia in Physics Learning: Its Effects on Critical Thinking Abilty. JIPF (Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Fisika), 5(2), 88. https://doi.org/10.26737/jipf.v5i2.1765
  14. Liu, Y. (2023). Matches and mismatches between university teachers’ and students’ perceptions of E-learning: A qualitative study in China. Heliyon, 9(6), e17496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17496
  15. Määttä, S., Hannula-Sormunen, M., Halme, H., & McMullen, J. (2022). Guiding students’ attention towards multiplicative relations around them: A classroom intervention. Journal of Numerical Cognition, 8(1), 36–52. https://doi.org/10.5964/jnc.6363
  16. Manurung, S. R., & Panggabean, D. D. (2020). Improving students’ thinking ability in physics using interactive multimedia based problem solving. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 39(2), 460–470. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v39i2.28205
  17. Maqoqa, T. (2023). Exploring the effects of technology integration in the learning and teaching of mathematics: A case of one rural university in the Eastern Cape, South Africa. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147- 4478), 12(2), 407–415. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v12i2.2386
  18. Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2002). Aids to computer-based multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 12(1), 107–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00018-4
  19. Milton, J. H., Flores, M. M., Moore, A. J., Taylor, J. J., & Burton, M. E. (2019). Using the Concrete–Representational–Abstract Sequence to Teach Conceptual Understanding of Basic Multiplication and Division. Learning Disability Quarterly, 42(1), 32–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948718790089
  20. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
  21. Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Ruddock, G., O’Sullivan, C. Y., & Preuschoff, C. (2009). TIMSS 2011 assessment frameworks. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College.
  22. Noetel, M., Griffith, S., Delaney, O., Harris, N. R., Sanders, T., Parker, P., Del Pozo Cruz, B., & Lonsdale, C. (2022). Multimedia Design for Learning: An Overview of Reviews With Meta-Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research, 92(3), 413–454. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543211052329
  23. Nuraeni, Z., Indaryanti, I., & Sukmaningthias, N. (2021). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Bercirikan CTL Berbantuan GeoGebra Menggunakan Model Flipped Learning. Jurnal Elemen, 7(1), 56–67. https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v7i1.2723
  24. OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Results (Volume I): What Students Know and Can Do. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en
  25. Peng, J., Yuan, B., Sun, M., Jiang, M., & Wang, M. (2022). Computer-Based Scaffolding for Sustainable Project-Based Learning: Impact on High- and Low-Achieving Students. Sustainability, 14(19), 12907. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912907
  26. Permendikbudristek,. (2022). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia Nomor 7 Tahun 2022 Tentang Standar Isi Pada Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini. Jenjang Pendidikan Dasar, dan Jenjang Pendidikan Menengah.
  27. Pratiwi, N. K. S. P. (2019). Pentingnya peran orang tua dalam pendidikan karakter anak usia sekolah dasar. Adi Widya: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 3(1), 83–83. https://doi.org/10.25078/aw.v3i1.908
  28. Purba, H. S., Sukmawati, A., Wiranda, N., Suryaningsih, Y., & Aprilian, R. (2021). Developing Wetland Contextual Interactive Learning Media on Numbers Using Drill and Practice Method. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 16(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.22342/jpm.16.1.14153.45-56
  29. Radu, I., Yuan, J., Huang, X., & Schneider, B. (2023). Charting opportunities and guidelines for augmented reality in makerspaces through prototyping and co-design research. Computers & Education: X Reality, 2, 100008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cexr.2023.100008
  30. Sanchez, H. S., Kuchah, K., Rodrigues, L., & de Pietri, E. (2018). Pre-service language teachers’ development of appropriate pedagogies: A transition from insightful critiques to educational insights. Teaching and Teacher Education, 70, 236–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.11.024
  31. Sari, V. S., Purwaningsih, E., Winarto, W., & Pramono, N. A. (2021). Development of the Interactive Multimedia Software “Inquiry Play-Room” as an Electronic Learning Resource for Rotation and Equilibrium Topic. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM), 15(07), 81. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v15i07.21561
  32. Sawitri Pratiwi, N. Pt. D., Putra, Md., & Sastra Agustika, Gst. N. (2020). Pengaruh Model Think Talk Write Berbantuan Multimedia terhadap Keterampilan Berbicara Siswa SD. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar, 4(1), 33. https://doi.org/10.23887/jisd.v4i1.24277
  33. Setyowati, R. R., Rochmat, S., Prof., Department of Social Sciences, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia, [email protected], Aman, A., Prof., Department of Social Sciences, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia, [email protected], Nugroho, A. N. P., & Lecturer, Department of Social Sciences, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia, [email protected]. (2023). Virtual Reality on Contextual Learning during Covid-19 to Improve Students’ Learning Outcomes and Participation. International Journal of Instruction, 16(1), 173–190. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.16110a
  34. Shen, C., Wu, Y.-C. J., & Lee, T. (2014). Developing a NFC-equipped smart classroom: Effects on attitudes toward computer science. Computers in Human Behavior, 30, 731–738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.09.002
  35. Sung, H.-Y. (2017). Incorporating technology in children’s storytime: Cultural-historical activity theory as a means of reconciling contradictions. Library & Information Science Research, 39(1), 46–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2017.01.007
  36. Tapingkae, P., Panjaburee, P., Hwang, G.-J., & Srisawasdi, N. (2020). Effects of a formative assessment-based contextual gaming approach on students’ digital citizenship behaviours, learning motivations, and perceptions. Computers & Education, 159, 103998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103998
  37. Tudor, S. L. (2013). Formal – Non-formal – Informal in Education. 5th International Conference EDU-WORLD 2012 - Education Facing Contemporary World Issues, 76, 821–826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.04.213
  38. Zhang, X., Tlili, A., Guo, J., Griffiths, D., Huang, R., Looi, C.-K., & Burgos, D. (2023). Developing rural Chinese children’s computational thinking through ­game-based learning and parental involvement. The Journal of Educational Research, 116(1), 17–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2023.2167798