Peningkatan pemahaman mahasiswa terhadap implementasi manajemen dan pengembangan program bimbingan dan konseling di sma melalui focus group discussion

Southeast Asian Journal of Technology and Science July 24, 2026 Volume 7, Number 1 15 authors

Abstract

Professional management of school Guidance and Counseling (GC) programs requires the integration of needs assessment, service selection, collaboration, evaluation, adaptation, and innovation. This qualitative study employed a single-case study design to analyze indications of increased understanding as reflected in the growing complexity and conceptual interconnectedness of classroom discourse. A class discussion based on the principles of Focus Group Discussion (FGD) involved 45 students and one school counselor on May 23, 2026, followed by a recorded group interview conducted on June 6, 2026. The research corpus consisted of seven documented student question turns (P1–P7), practitioner responses, observation notes, and supporting documents. The questions were analyzed sequentially using four adapted categories: informative–procedural, justificatory–relational, systemic–evaluative, and critical–contextual. The resulting discourse demonstrated connections between the basic procedures of program planning and instrument selection, needs-based service decisions, stakeholder involvement, evaluation, implementation alignment, and contextual innovation. The sequence of questions was not interpreted as evidence of spontaneous, individual, or causal change because speaker identities, prior question preparation, and the overall discourse preceding the FGD were not documented. Therefore, the findings indicate an increase in the complexity and interconnectedness of the discourse generated during the forum, which was interpreted as qualitative evidence of improved understanding at the forum level. Future studies are recommended to employ small-group FGDs, record the entire interaction, and incorporate individual reflective accounts.

Authors

  1. Nia Sapitri

    Program Studi Bimbingan Konseling Universitas Hamzanwadi

  2. Yuliana Asmiati

    Program Studi Bimbingan Konseling Universitas Hamzanwadi

  3. Lina Juliana

    Program Studi Bimbingan Konseling Universitas Hamzanwadi

  4. Ratna Aida Hifzi Inayatika

    Program Studi Bimbingan Konseling Universitas Hamzanwadi

  5. Luski Meri Alfin

    Program Studi Bimbingan Konseling Universitas Hamzanwadi

  6. Dewi Restu Sirtupi Laili

    Program Studi Bimbingan Konseling Universitas Hamzanwadi

  7. Yuliana Eka Safitri

    Program Studi Bimbingan Konseling Universitas Hamzanwadi

  8. Widiana Ramdani

    Program Studi Bimbingan Konseling Universitas Hamzanwadi

  9. Sri Dewi Supriani

    Program Studi Bimbingan Konseling Universitas Hamzanwadi

  10. Rini Sugiartini

    Program Studi Bimbingan Konseling Universitas Hamzanwadi

  11. Denda Wanda Ariani

    Program Studi Bimbingan Konseling Universitas Hamzanwadi

  12. Muhammad Marzuki

    Program Studi Bimbingan Konseling Universitas Hamzanwadi

  13. M. Farhan

    Program Studi Bimbingan Konseling Universitas Hamzanwadi

  14. Indra Surya Ali

    Program Studi Bimbingan Konseling Universitas Hamzanwadi

  15. Fitri Aulia

    Program Studi Bimbingan Konseling Universitas Hamzanwadi

Keywords

Manajemen BKPengembangan program BK

References

  1. Aulia, F., Fathurrahman, & Fahmi, W. S. R. (2025). Analisis Assesment Daftar Cek Masalah (Dcm) Berbasis Aplikasi Google Form (Studi Pendahuluan Di Sman 1 Sukamulia). Jurnal Konseling Pendidikan (Jkp), 9(Dcm), 60–71. Https://Doi.Org/10.29408/Jkp
  2. Biggs, J. B., & Collis, K. F. (1982). Evaluating The Quality Of Learning: The Solo Taxonomy (Structure Of The Observed Learning Outcome). Academic Press. Https://Doi.Org/10.1016/C2013-0-10375-3
  3. Chin, C., & Brown, D. E. (2002). Student-Generated Questions: A Meaningful Aspect Of Learning In Science. International Journal Of Science Education, 24(5), 521–549. Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/09500690110095249
  4. Chin, C., & Osborne, J. (2008). Students' Questions: A Potential Resource For Teaching And Learning Science. Studies In Science Education, 44(1), 1–39. Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/03057260701828101
  5. Dewi, S. (2022). Layanan Bimbingan Karier Dalam Upaya Meningkatkan Self-Efficacy Siswa Kelas Xii Dalam Pemilihan Karier. Jurnal Edukasi: Jurnal Bimbingan Konseling, 8(1), 29–44. Https://Doi.Org/10.22373/Je.V8i1.8995
  6. Junaidi, M. J. H. M. (2020). Prinsip Dan Langkah-Langkah Penerapan Focus Group Discussion Untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan. Jurnalistrendi : Jurnal Linguistik, Sastra, Dan Pendidikan, 5(2003). Https://Doi.Org/10.51673/Jurnalistrendi.V5i2.426
  7. Kurniawan, L. (2015). Pengembangan Program Layanan Bimbingan Dan Konseling Komprehensif Di Sma. Jppk (Psikologi Pendidikan & Konseling), 1, 1–8. Https://Doi.Org/10.26858/Jpkk.V1i1.1351
  8. Lalu Muh Fahrurrijal, M. (2019). Peran Guru Bimbingan Dan Konseling Dalam Implementasi Program Bk Di Sma Negeri Se-Lombok Timur. Jurnal Konseling Pendidikan, 3(1), 20–29.
  9. Lia Mita Syahri, Tri Handani, A. M. (2024). Urgensi Manajemen Dalam Pelayanan Bimbingan Dan Konseling. Jubikops: Jurnal Bimbingan Konseling Dan Psikologi, 4(September), 177–188. Https://Doi.Org/10.56185/Jubikops.V4i2.823
  10. Marfuatun, & Fajrurrijal, L. M. (2019). Peran Guru Bimbingan Dan Konseling Dalam Implementasi Program Bk Di Sma Negeri Se-Lombok Timur. Jkp (Jurnal Konseling Pendidikan), 3(1), 20–29. Https://Doi.Org/10.29408/Jkp.V3i1.2424
  11. Nugroho, D. A., Khasanah, D. N., Pangestuti, I. A. I., & Kholili, M. I. (2021). Problematika Pelaksanaan Bimbingan Dan Konseling Di Sma: A Systematic Literature Review (Slr). Teraputik: Jurnal Bimbingan Dan Konseling, 5(1), 87–96. Https://Doi.Org/10.26539/Teraputik.51647
  12. Oudenampsen, J., Pol, M. Van De, Blijlevens, N., & Das, E. (2023). Interdisciplinary Education Affects Student Learning : A Focus Group Study. Bmc Medical Education, 9, 1–11. Https://Doi.Org/10.1186/S12909-023-04103-9
  13. Pathul Zamdi, Suhartiwi, M. T. (2024). Analisis Hasil Angket Kebutuhan Peserta Didik (Akpd) Untuk Menentukan Topik Layanan Bimbingan Klasikal Pada Kelas X-I Di Sma Negeri 1 Selong. Jurnal Konseling Pendidikan (Jkp), 8, 8–22. Https://Doi.Org/10.29408/Jkp.V8i1.26002
  14. Qomaruddin, H. S. (2024). Kajian Teoritis Tentang Teknik Analisis Data Dalam Penelitian Kualitatif: Perspektif Spradley, Miles Dan Huberman. Journal Of Management, Accounting And Administration, 1(2), 77–84. Https://Doi.Org/10.52620/Jomaa.V1i2.93
  15. Ridwan. (2011). Pengembangan Manajemen Jejaring Bimbingan Dan Konseling (Mjbk) Berbasis Analisis Kebutuhan. Jurnal Educatio, 6(1), 39–52. Https://Doi.Org/10.29408/Edc.V6i1.22
  16. Romiaty, Dony Apriatama, E. P. P. S. (2023). Pengembangan Panduan Asesmen Kebutuhan Peserta Didik Dalam Merencanakan Program Bk. Advice: Jurnal Bimbingan Dan Konseling, 5(1), 9–17. Https://Doi.Org/10.32585/Advice.V5i1.3678
  17. Sinaga, M. H. P., Qurrata, K., & Andini, V. (2022). Pola Pelaksanaan Manajemen Bimbingan Dan Konseling Di Sekolah Menengah Atas. Bulletin Of Counseling And Psychotherapy Pola, 4(1), 110–116. Https://Doi.Org/Doi.Org/10.51214/Bocp.V4i2.166
  18. Yuniarti, Bahrani, S. K. (2025). Penerapan Focus Group Discussion (Fgd) Dalam Meningkatkan Keaktifan Mahasiswa Pada Mata Kuliah Psikologi Pendidikan. Journal Of Instructional And Development Researches (Jider), 5(6), 845–854. Https://Doi.Org/10.53621/Jider.V5i6.664