Prevalence of musculoskeletal discomfort (msd) among heeled shoe user: the correlation between the foot regions and discomfort

Southeast Asian Journal of Technology and Science November 13, 2020 Volume 1, Number 2 3 authors

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analysis the correlation between the foot regions and discomfort among heeled shoes user. This study used the quantitave correlation method with 250 sample. The questionnaire was adapted from the standardized Nordic questionnaire and Cornell Musculoskeletal Discomfort questionnaire. Result shows that there is relationship between heel height and the discomfort at foot palm. The cumulative percentage of discomfort at forefoot area 2 (F2) have the highest percentage (20.4 %) followed by hindfoot (19.58 %), forefoot area 5 (F5) and midfoot (18.06 %), Forefoot area 1 (F1) (14.3 %) and Forefoot area 4 (9.5 %). Based of the result it is recommended to have more education exposure related to MSD prevalence as most of the wear do not aware the risk of foot discomfort may lead to low back pain if ignoring the foot discomfort. Further research is needed in order to find the most suitable height of the heel shoes in minimizing the risk of having foot MSD.

Authors

  1. Nor ‘Amirah binti Talib

    Department of Mechanical Engineering, Polytechnic of Sultan Mizan Zainal Abidin

  2. Ismaniza binti Ismail

    Department of Mechanical Engineering, Polytechnic of Sultan Mizan Zainal Abidin

  3. Surniza binti Mohd Hilmin

    Department of Mechanical Engineering, Polytechnic of Sultan Mizan Zainal Abidin

Keywords

Musculoskeletal discomfort Foot MSD Nordic Questionnaire

References

  1. Barkema, D. D., Derrick, T. R., & Martin, P. E. (2012). Heel height affects lower extremity frontal plane joint moments during walking. Gait & Posture, 35(3), 483–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.11.013
  2. Chuan, T. K., Hartono, M., & Kumar, N. (2010). Anthropometry of the Singaporean and Indonesian populations. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 40(6), 757–766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2010.05.001
  3. Domínguez, G., Munuera, P., Lafuente, G., & Martínez, L. (2006). Quantification of the compensation of differences in limb length using heel raises. The Foot, 16(3), 130–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foot.2006.03.001
  4. Gong, W., Ma, S., & Ro, H. (2011). Correlation between the Lumbar Lordosis Curve and the Temperature Difference of the Lower Extremity Regions in Patients Lumbar Herniated Nucleus Pulposus. Journal of Physical Therapy Science, 23(1), 37–40. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.23.37
  5. Hignett, S., & McAtamney, L. (2000). Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA). Applied Ergonomics, 31(2), 201–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-6870(99)00039-3
  6. Hue, O., Simoneau, M., Marcotte, J., Berrigan, F., Doré, J., Marceau, P., Marceau, S., Tremblay, A., & Teasdale, N. (2007). Body weight is a strong predictor of postural stability. Gait & Posture, 26(1), 32–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.07.005
  7. Klamklay, J., Sungkhapong, A., Yodpijit, N., & E. Patterson, P. (2008). Anthropometry of the southern Thai population. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 38(1), 111–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2007.09.001
  8. Menz, H. B., Dufour, A. B., Riskowski, J. L., Hillstrom, H. J., & Hannan, M. T. (2013). Foot posture, foot function and low back pain: the Framingham Foot Study. Rheumatology, 52(12), 2275–2282. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/ket298
  9. M.Y., R., Rizal H., M., & S.A.R., S. N. (2009). Anthropometry Dimensions of Older Malaysians: Comparison of Age, Gender and Ethnicity. Asian Social Science, 5(6), 133–140. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v5n6p133
  10. Nelson-Wong, E., & Callaghan, J. P. (2010). The impact of a sloped surface on low back pain during prolonged standing work: A biomechanical analysis. Applied Ergonomics, 41(6), 787–795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2010.01.005
  11. Shiri, R., Martimo, K.-P., Miranda, H., Ketola, R., Kaila-Kangas, L., Liira, H., Karppinen, J., & Viikari-Juntura, E. (2011). The effect of workplace intervention on pain and sickness absence caused by upper-extremity musculoskeletal disorders. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 37(2), 120–128. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.3141
  12. Speksnijder, C. M., vd Munckhof, R. J. H., Moonen, S. A., & Walenkamp, G. H. I. M. (2005). The higher the heel the higher the forefoot-pressure in ten healthy women. The Foot, 15(1), 17–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foot.2004.10.001
  13. Strazdins, L., & Bammer, G. (2004). Women, work and musculoskeletal health. Social Science & Medicine, 58(6), 997–1005. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0277-9536(03)00260-0
  14. Yung-Hui, L., & Wei-Hsien, H. (2005). Effects of shoe inserts and heel height on foot pressure, impact force, and perceived comfort during walking. Applied Ergonomics, 36(3), 355–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2004.11.001
  15. Dairman, M. (2016, September 8). Home Page. 1foot2foot.Com. https://1foot2foot.com/suffolk-va-foot-doctors-and-surgeons-can-treat-your-foot-heel-and-ankle-pain/foot-and-ankle-pain-and-treatment/
  16. SOCSO Annual Report, Social Security Organization, Malaysia, 2010.
  17. SOCSO Annual Report, Social Security Organization, Malaysia, 2018.