Local cultural values and language practices in shaping student learning behavior: a qualitative study in rural indonesia

Jurnal Konseling dan Pendidikan July 25, 2026 Volume 14, Number 1 1 authors

Abstract

Previous studies on multilingual education in rural contexts have often overlooked how local cultural norms and language hierarchies jointly shape students’ learning engagement. This study addresses that gap by exploring the mechanisms through which local cultural values and linguistic practices influence student learning behavior in multilingual rural schools of Indonesia. Specifically, the study focuses on three behavioral dimensions: classroom participation, learning motivation, and comprehension strategies in culturally diverse learning settings. Employing a qualitative multiple case study design, data were collected from three rural schools across different provinces through semi-structured interviews with 24 participants (students, teachers, and parents), classroom observations, and short-term cultural immersion. Thematic analysis was conducted using NVivo software, supported by triangulation and member checking to ensure analytical validity. Findings reveal that learning behaviors are shaped by local cultural values, particularly respect for authority, collective identity, and language hierarchy, which mediate students’ participation and motivation. Students negotiate between home and school cultures, often resulting in passive engagement when formal teaching styles conflict with communal learning norms. Variations across sites highlight both shared cultural mechanisms and context-specific adaptations. The study concludes that culturally responsive pedagogy is essential for improving learning engagement in rural multilingual contexts. Practical implications include integrating cultural and linguistic competence into teacher education programs and aligning curriculum design with the sociolinguistic realities of rural Indonesia.

Authors

  1. Teti Berliani

    Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Palangka Raya

Keywords

Cultural Adaptation.Language Practices.Local Cultural Values.Multilingual Rural Schools.Student Learning Behavior.

References

  1. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications.
  2. Christou, P. A. (2022). How to use thematic analysis in qualitative research. Journal of Qualitative Research in Tourism, 3(2), 79–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40473-022-00379-8
  3. Darmawan, I. G. N., Suryadi, A., Budimansyah, D., & Susilo, S. (2024). Indonesian education: Past, present, and future. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003487268
  4. Dumlao, R. (2023). A guide to collaborative communication for service-learning and community engagement partners. Taylor & Francis.
  5. Farikah, F., Rachmawati, U., Widiyanto, D., Hananto, I., Jendriadi, J., & Pradita, L. E. (2024). Understanding Indonesian student behavior and character in English language teaching contexts: A qualitative ethnographic investigation. Interling: International Journal of English Language Teaching, Literature and Linguistics, 2(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.56799/interling.v2i1.52
  6. Fitriadi, F., Sinaga, R. M., & Muhammad, R. R. (2024). A literature review on the cultural perspective study in elementary school education in Indonesia. Journal of Innovation in Educational and Cultural Research, 5(1), 51–61. https://doi.org/10.46843/jiecr.v5i1.131
  7. Gunawan, W., Kurniawan, E., & Hakim, M. A. (2025). Navigating inconsistencies: The challenges of implementing multilingual education policy in rural Indonesia. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 11, 101601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101601
  8. Herlina, H. (2023). Interdisciplinary research: Collaborative insights (Vol. 2): The effectiveness of face-to-face learning limited to the learning outcomes of citizenship education. Universitas Negeri Makassar Press.
  9. Kadir, R. (2024). Assessing language vitality of the Gorontalo language. Gorontalo State University Press.
  10. Kerr, M. R. M. (2025). Educator equity and pedagogy: Multilingual learners in rural schools [Doctoral dissertation, Antioch University]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
  11. Kumar, R., Zusho, A., & Bondie, R. (2018). Weaving cultural relevance and achievement motivation into inclusive classroom cultures. Educational Psychologist, 53(2), 78–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2018.1432361
  12. Lee, E., Ilseven, E., & Puranam, P. (2023). Scaling nonhierarchically: A theory of conflict‐free organizational growth with limited hierarchical growth. Strategic Management Journal, 44(12), 3042–3064. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3572
  13. Lestari, Y. B. (2020). Integration of local texts and cultural practices in localised EFL classrooms: An ethnographic study of a rural Indonesian school [Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Negeri Malang]. Institutional Repository.
  14. Luciana, O., Fatmasari, R. K., Siallagan, J., & Wicaksi, D. (2024). Parental communication preferences in rural communities: A qualitative study on the use of Indonesian language in parenting. Retorika: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa, 10(3), 810–824. https://doi.org/10.22225/jr.10.3.2024.810-824
  15. Makri, C., & Neely, A. (2021). Grounded theory: A guide for exploratory studies in management research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20, 16094069211013654. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211013654
  16. Mohammed, S. H., & Kinyo, L. (2020). The role of constructivism in the enhancement of social studies education. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(7), 249–256. https://doi.org/10.31838/jcr.07.07.41
  17. Mpuangnan, K. N., & Ntombela, S. (2024). Community voices in curriculum development. Curriculum Perspectives, 44(1), 49–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41297-023-00225-8
  18. Paciotto, C., & Delany-Barmann, G. A. (2024). Multilingual educators in superdiverse rural schools: Placing administrators and teachers’ cultural and linguistic wealth at the center of rural education. Rural Educator, 45(4), 62–76. https://doi.org/10.35608/ruraled.v45i4.1831
  19. Palennari, M., Jamaluddin, A. B., Syam, S., Rosba, E., Machmud, M. T., & Fatmawati, A. (2023). The power of educational values for shaping the character of university students in the disruption era: Exploring local culture. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 13(6), 224–238. https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2023-0169
  20. Prilyasinta, N. W., & Purnawan, I. K. (2025). Revitalising indigenous language: Students’ attitudes and parental involvement in Balinese language learning. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2025.1234567
  21. Rajaram, K. (2023). Cultural intelligence in teaching and learning. In Learning intelligence: Innovative and digital transformative learning strategies—Cultural and social engineering perspectives (pp. 57–118). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27340-2_4
  22. Salinas-Willich, C. L. (2023). Closing the racial gap: Investigating the impact of teacher preparation programs on teachers’ understanding of self-efficacy and cognitive dissonance when teaching students of color [Doctoral dissertation, William Woods University]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
  23. Shin, H., & Jang, I. C. (2023). Language learning autobiographies, identity texts, and critical teacher education. English Teaching, 78(1), 197–223. https://doi.org/10.15858/engtea.78.1.202303.197
  24. Suriandjo, H. S. (2024). The role of grounded theory in understanding urban society and design: A review based on Creswell and Poth. Global Science, 5(2), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.56799/globalsci.v5i2.207
  25. Swartz, D. L. (2022). Symbolic power, politics, and intellectuals: The political sociology of Pierre Bourdieu. University of Chicago Press.
  26. Thomas, E. (2020). Cross-cultural challenges to the development of a culture-sensitive pedagogy within an emerging ‘global culture.’ In Latest contributions to cross-cultural psychology (pp. 303–317). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003084504-18
  27. Tibenda, J., Jukes, M., & Sitabkhan, Y. (2021). Adapting pedagogy to cultural context. RTI Press. https://doi.org/10.3768/rtipress.2021.op.0066.2109
  28. UNESCO. (2020). Global education monitoring report 2020: Inclusion and education—All means all. UNESCO Publishing. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000373718
  29. Villa, M., & Knutas, A. (2020). Rural communities and schools: Valuing and reproducing local culture. Journal of Rural Studies, 80, 626–633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.09.011
  30. Vyacheslavovna, S. E., & Victorovna, R. A. (2020). The role of socio-cultural institutions in the education of young people in rural territories. Azimuth of Scientific Research: Pedagogy and Psychology, 9(3), 248–252.
  31. Widyana, A., Puspitasari, E., Kusumawati, N. I., & Sutrisno, Z. (2023). The effect of equalizing education quality on student learning outcomes in frontier, outermost, and least developed areas (3T). ISLLAC: Journal of Intensive Studies on Language, Literature, Art, and Culture, 7(2), 85–94. https://doi.org/10.17977/um006v7i22023p85.