Beyond tokenism: community-based advocacy and participation in rural WASH governance

Jurnal Konseling dan Pendidikan June 04, 2026 Volume 14, Number 1 3 authors

Abstract

This study examines community-based advocacy in rural Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene (WASH) governance across two administrative posts in Timor-Leste's Manufahi Municipality. While existing scholarship often frames community participation as inherently empowering, it overlooks how participatory advocacy can simultaneously reproduce local inequalities through elite capture and weak accountability mechanisms. Using a descriptive qualitative approach drawing on interviews, document analysis, and participant observation with ten key informants, the study finds that CBA strengthened community water management groups, revitalized Tara Bandu customary practices, expanded NGO partnerships, and raised public awareness. However, decision-making authority and resource control frequently remained concentrated among local elites and customary power holders. Applying Arnstein's (1969) ladder of participation, community engagement operated largely at the Partnership level, with limited Citizen Control. Participation was often tokenistic: women, youth, and marginalized households were consulted but exercised little influence over financial management, infrastructure prioritization, and enforcement decisions. The study concludes that community-based advocacy alone does not guarantee equitable rural water governance in structurally unequal contexts. Sustainable rural water systems require not only community participation but also formalized social accountability mechanisms, transparent resource governance, and explicit equity safeguards within grassroots institutions.

Authors

  1. Justino Da silva

    Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana

  2. Daniel D Kameo

    Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana

  3. Royke R Siahainenia

    Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana

Keywords

Community-based advocacyElite captureRural WASH governanceArnstein’s ladderTimor-Lest

References

  1. Agarwal, B. (2001). Participatory exclusions, community forestry, and gender: An analysis for South Asia and a conceptual framework. World Development, 29(10), 1623–1648
  2. Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225.
  3. Berkes, F. (2009). Evolution of co-management: Role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(5), 1692–1702.
  4. Chirgwin, H., Cairncross, S., Zehra, D., & Sharma Waddington, H. (2021). Interventions promoting uptake of water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) technologies in low‐ and middle‐income countries: An evidence and gap map of effectiveness studies. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 17(4), e1194. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1194.
  5. Cleaver, F. (1999). Paradoxes of participation: Questioning participatory approaches to development. Journal of International Development, 11(4), 597–612.
  6. Cornwall, A. (2008). Unpacking participation: Models, meanings and practices. Community Development Journal, 43(3), 269–283.
  7. Dasgupta, A., & Beard, V. A. (2007). Community-driven development, collective action and elite capture in Indonesia. Development and Change, 38(2), 229–249.
  8. Fox, J. (2015). Social accountability: What does the evidence really say? World Development, 72, 346–361.
  9. Fung, A., & Wright, E. O. (2003). Deepening Democracy: Institutional Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance. Verso.
  10. Gaventa, J. and Barrett, G. (2012). Mapping the outcomes of citizen engagement. World Development, 40(12), pp.2399–2410.
  11. Grant, M. L., Nguyen, T. T., Vieira, A., Niner, S. L., & Roche, C. (2023). Working together: A study of civil society partnerships between WASH (water, sanitation, and hygiene) and GESI (gender equality and social inclusion) organisations in Timor-Leste. Frontiers in Water, 5, 1047955.
  12. Jackson, S. E., & Palmer, L. R. (2012). Modernising water: Articulating custom in water governance in Australia and East Timor. International Indigenous Policy Journal, 3(3), Article 7.
  13. Krampe, F., & Gignoux, S. (2018). Water service provision and peacebuilding in East Timor: Exploring the socioecological determinants for sustaining peace. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 12(2), 185–207.
  14. Lockwood, H., & Smits, S. (2011). Supporting Rural Water Supply: Moving Towards a Service Delivery Approach. Practical Action Publishing.
  15. Mansuri, G., & Rao, V. (2013). Localizing Development: Does Participation Work? World Bank.
  16. McAdam, D., Tarrow, S. and Tilly, C. (2001). Dynamics of contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  17. Mertens, D. M. (2009). Transformative research and evaluation. Guilford Press.
  18. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (2nd ed.). Sage.
  19. Miyazawa, N. (2013). Customary law and community-based natural resource management in post-conflict Timor-Leste. Environmental Peacebuilding Association Research Series.
  20. Mosse, D. (2001). People's knowledge, participation and patronage: Operations and representations in rural development. In B. Cooke & U. Kothari (Eds.), Participation: The New Tyranny? (pp. 16–35). Zed Books.
  21. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press.
  22. Susilo, A. T. H. (2021). The Indonesian National Program for Community Empowerment (PNPM)-Rural: Decentralization in the context of neoliberalism and World Bank policies [Doctoral dissertation, Erasmus University Rotterdam]. Erasmus University Repository RePub.
  23. Troeger, C., Colombara, D. V., Rao, P. C., Khalil, I. A., Brown, A., Brewer, T. G., Guerrant, R. L., Houpt, E. R., Kotloff, K. L., Misra, B., Petri, W. A., Platts-Mills, J., Riddle, M. S., Swartz, S. J., Forouzanfar, M. H., Reiner, R. C., Hay, S. I., & Mokdad, A. H. (2018). Global disability-adjusted life-year estimates of long-term health burden and undernutrition attributable to diarrhoeal diseases in children younger than 5 years. The Lancet Global Health, 6(3), e255–e269. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30045-7
  24. UNICEF Timor-Leste. (2020). Situation analysis of children in Timor-Leste. UNICEF. https://www.unicef.org/timorleste/media/4421/file/SitAn%202020%20English%20full%20report.pdf
  25. Whalen, M., Grumbley, A., & da Silva, J. (2016). Applying a community scorecard for rural water services in Timor-Leste [Paper presentation]. 40th WEDC International Conference, Loughborough, UK. https://wedc-knowledge.lboro.ac.uk/resources/conference/40/Whalen-2661.pdf
  26. Willetts, J. R. (2012). A service delivery approach for rural water supply in Timor-Leste: Institutional options and strategy. Institute for Sustainable Futures, University of Technology Sydney.
  27. Yusuf, T. S. (2018). Governmentality, participation and the promise of empowerment: A case study of WaterAid's Community WASH Management (CWM) programmes in Nigeria [Doctoral dissertation, University of Reading]. CentAUR Repository.