Observing the use of technology for students' independent work on online learning assignments

Jurnal Konseling dan Pendidikan September 20, 2024 Volume 12, Number 3 4 authors

Abstract

This research aims to determine students' responses to online learning, the level of student independence in carrying out online learning assignments, differences in the level of independence of students in Fashion, Culinary, and Tourism study programs, the difficulties faced by students when participating in the online learning process and carrying out learning assignments, and Efforts to find solutions when experiencing difficulties following the online learning process. Conducted at SMK N 4 Yogyakarta, this quantitative descriptive research found that student responses to this research were in the medium category at 71.25% (114 students) with an average score of 18.71. Meanwhile, the level of independence in online assignments is in the high category at 78.13% (125 students), with an average score of 62.00. Not only that, there is a difference in independence in carrying out students' online learning assignments in the Fashion and Catering study program, there is no difference in independence between students in the Food and Tourism study program, and there is no difference in independence between students in the Fashion and Tourism study program. On the other hand, the difficulty in online learning assignments in the medium category was 63.75% (102 students) with an average score of 41.03. Lastly, students' efforts when experiencing difficulties were in the high category at 99.37% (159 students), with an average score of 46.37.

Authors

  1. Ricka Yusra Weni

    Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

  2. Endang Mulyatiningsih

    Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

  3. Nixigo Sasvito

    Institut Teknologi dan Bisnis Visi Nusantara Bogor

  4. Zaid Zaid

    Institut Teknologi dan Bisnis Visi Nusantara Bogor

Keywords

IndependencyOnline learningOnline assignmentOnline learning processStudent

References

  1. Akimov, N., Kurmanov, N., Uskelenova, A., Aidargaliyeva, N., Mukhiyayeva, D., Rakhimova, S., Raimbekov, B., & Utegenova, Z. (2023). Components of education 4.0 in open innovation competence frameworks: Systematic review. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 9(2), 100037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100037
  2. Aldhafeeri, F. M., & Alotaibi, A. A. (2023). Reimagining Education for Successful and Sustainable Digital Shifting. SAGE Open, 13(1), 215824402311544. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231154474
  3. Allam, Z. (2020). Demystifying the Aspect of Quality in Higher Education: Insights From Saudi Arabia. SAGE Open, 10(1), 215824401989905. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019899057
  4. AlQashouti, N. M., Yaqot, M., & Menezes, B. C. (2024). Online Learning and Teaching during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Higher Education in Qatar. Sustainability, 16(6), 2265. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16062265
  5. Andrianto Pangondian, R., Insap Santosa, P., & Nugroho, E. (2019). Faktor - Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Kesuksesan Pembelajaran Daring Dalam Revolusi Industri 4.0. Sainteks 2019, 56–60.
  6. Annauval, A. R., & Ghofur, M. A. (2021). Lingkungan Keluarga dan Motivasi Belajar terhadap Hasil Belajar Mata Pelajaran Ekonomi pada Pembelajaran Daring. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 3(5), 2114–2122.
  7. Blaine, A. M. (2019). Interaction and presence in the virtual classroom: An analysis of the perceptions of students and teachers in online and blended Advanced Placement courses. Computers & Education, 132, 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.01.004
  8. Bouranta, N., & Psomas, E. (2024). Educational innovation practices in primary and secondary schools during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Educational Management, 38(2), 355–373. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-02-2023-0075
  9. Chandrasiri, N. R., & Weerakoon, B. S. (2022). Online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: Perceptions of allied health sciences undergraduates. Radiography, 28(2), 545–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2021.11.008
  10. Crossley, M., & Sprague, T. (2014). Education for sustainable development: Implications for small island developing states (SIDS). International Journal of Educational Development, 35, 86–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2013.03.002
  11. Dvorsky, M. R., Shroff, D., Larkin Bonds, W. B., Steinberg, A., Breaux, R., & Becker, S. P. (2023). Impacts of COVID-19 on the school experience of children and adolescents with special educational needs and disabilities. Current Opinion in Psychology, 52, 101635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2023.101635
  12. Erawan, M. A. S. P., Zaid, Z., Pratondo, K., & Lestari, A. Y. (2021). Predicting Covid-19 Vaccination Intention: The Role of Health Belief Model of Muslim Societies in Yogyakarta. Al-Sihah: The Public Health Science Journal, 13(1), 36–50. https://doi.org/10.24252/AL-SIHAH.V13I1.20647
  13. Ghashim, I. A., & Arshad, M. (2023). Internet of Things (IoT)-Based Teaching and Learning: Modern Trends and Open Challenges. Sustainability, 15(21), 15656. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152115656
  14. Gilbert, A., & Bowden, R. (2017). Image and video mining through online learning. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 158, 72–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cviu.2017.02.001
  15. Haderer, B., & Ciolacu, M. (2022). Education 4.0: Artificial Intelligence Assisted Task- and Time Planning System. Procedia Computer Science, 200, 1328–1337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.01.334
  16. Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3, 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004
  17. Koroh, T. (2020). Respons Mahasiswa Terhadap Pembelajaran Daring Dan Kemandirian Belajar Mahasiswa Selama Pandemi Covid-19. Widyadewata : Jurnal Balai Diklat Keagamaan Denpasar, Volume 3, 54–59.
  18. Malysheva, O., Tokareva, E., Orchakova, L., & Smirnova, Y. (2022). The effect of online learning in modern history education. Heliyon, 8(7), e09965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09965
  19. Manjeese, C. (2022). Divulging the efficacy of e-learning through the eyes of university students: Lessons from a third world perspective. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 127, 103187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2022.103187
  20. Miranda, J., Navarrete, C., Noguez, J., Molina-Espinosa, J.-M., Ramírez-Montoya, M.-S., Navarro-Tuch, S. A., Bustamante-Bello, M.-R., Rosas-Fernández, J.-B., & Molina, A. (2021). The core components of education 4.0 in higher education: Three case studies in engineering education. Computers & Electrical Engineering, 93, 107278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2021.107278
  21. Oliveira, G., Grenha Teixeira, J., Torres, A., & Morais, C. (2021). An exploratory study on the emergency remote education experience of higher education students and teachers during the COVID‐19 pandemic. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(4), 1357–1376. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13112
  22. Pradana, M., & Syarifuddin, S. (2021). The Struggle Is Real: Constraints of Online Education in Indonesia During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Frontiers in Education, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.753776
  23. Prasetyanto, D., Rizki, M., & Sunitiyoso, Y. (2022). Online Learning Participation Intention after COVID-19 Pandemic in Indonesia: Do Students Still Make Trips for Online Class? Sustainability, 14(4), 1982. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14041982
  24. Pratondo, K., & Zaid, Z. (2021). Customer Loyalty During Pandemic: Understanding Loyalty Through the Lens of Online Ride Hailing Service Quality. International Journal of Social Science and Business, 5(1), 69–75. https://doi.org/10.23887/IJSSB.V5I1.30933
  25. Shirish, A., Chandra, S., & Srivastava, S. C. (2021). Switching to online learning during COVID-19: Theorizing the role of IT mindfulness and techno eustress for facilitating productivity and creativity in student learning. International Journal of Information Management, 61, 102394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102394
  26. Siagian, G. (2021). Jurnal basicedu. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(3), 1683–1688.
  27. Singh, J., Steele, K., & Singh, L. (2021). Combining the Best of Online and Face-to-Face Learning: Hybrid and Blended Learning Approach for COVID-19, Post Vaccine, & Post-Pandemic World. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 50(2), 140–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472395211047865
  28. Stecuła, K., & Wolniak, R. (2022). Advantages and Disadvantages of E-Learning Innovations during COVID-19 Pandemic in Higher Education in Poland. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(3), 159. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8030159
  29. Swastika, A., & Lukita, G. (2020). Motivasi Belajar Dalam Pembelajaran Daring Berbasis Learning Management System (LMS) Schoology Pada Mata Kuliah Probabilitas. Indonesian Journal of Instructional …, 1, 9–13.
  30. Tong, D. H., Uyen, B. P., & Ngan, L. K. (2022). The effectiveness of blended learning on students’ academic achievement, self-study skills and learning attitudes: A quasi-experiment study in teaching the conventions for coordinates in the plane. Heliyon, 8(12), e12657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12657
  31. Zhang, J., Wang, Y., Zhao, Y., & Cai, X. (2018). Applications of inferential statistical methods in library and information science. Data and Information Management, 2(2), 103–120. https://doi.org/10.2478/dim-2018-0007