Hambatan, kebutuhan dan ambivalensi reaksi terhadap kebijakan publikasi internasional di Indonesia

Jurnal Konseling dan Pendidikan February 25, 2021 Volume 9, Number 1 3 authors

Abstract

In the efforts of internasionalization, change has been occurred in academia organisations in Indonesia. In higher education, there are several changes in research fields which was driven to publish international publications. While implementing this change, there was often an ambivalent reaction, both supporting change and opposing change. This ambivalent reaction will inhibit change and prompt counterproductive employees. Therefore, it is important to identify these reactions and factors associated with these reactions among organizational members. This study aims to investigate lecturers’ ambivalence regarding their responses to international publication policy.. This study also investigates the effect of employees’ personalitieson ambivalence reaction and the moderating effect.This study used a crossectional approach. Data were collected through lecturers in 5 social science faculties in a public university in Indonesia, using online questionnaire via google form. The instrument of ambivalence reaction are based on attitude toward change scale.Regression analysis was used to estimates the correlation, and interaction analysis was calculated to test the moderating effect. This study found that dispositional resistance to change’ personalitysignificantly correlated with ambivalence reaction.And the correlation was moderated by employee’s high trust in organization.However this study did not found a significance difference on low trust in management, dispositional resistance to change, and ambivalence. This study also found the challenges and the lecturer’s needs to publish in international publications.

Authors

  1. Rindi Ardika Melsalasa Sahputri

    Universitas Brawijaya

  2. Bambang Santoso Haryono

    Universitas Brawijaya

  3. Sujarwoto Sujarwoto

    Universitas Brawijaya

Keywords

AmbivalenceTrust in organizationDispositional resistance to changeScientific publication’s challengeScientific publication’s needs

References

  1. Alola, U. V., Simplice, A. A., & Alola, A. A. (2019). Linking supervisor incivility with job embeddedness and cynicism: The mediating role of employee selfefficacy. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10419/227972
  2. Amarantou, V., Kazakopoulou, S., Chatzoudes, D., & Chatzoglou, P. (2018). Resistance to change: an empirical investigation of its antecedents. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 31(2), 426–450. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-05-2017-0196
  3. Arsyad, S., Purwo, B. K., Sukamto, K. E., & Adnan, Z. (2019). Factors hindering Indonesian lecturers from publishing articles in reputable international journals. Journal on English as a Foreign Language, 9(1), 42. https://doi.org/10.23971/jefl.v9i1.982
  4. Borges, R., & Quintas, C. A. (2020). Understanding the individual’s reactions to the organizational change: a multidimensional approach. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 33(5), 667–681. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-09-2019-0279
  5. Ciampa, V., Sirowatka, M., Schuh, S. C., Fraccaroli, F., & van Dick, R. (2021). Ambivalent Identification as a Moderator of the Link Between Organizational Identification and Counterproductive Work Behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics, 169(1), 119–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04262-0
  6. Daniel, C. (2019). Effect of Organizational Change on Employee Job Performance. Asian Journal of Business and Management, 7. https://doi.org/10.24203/ajbm.v7i1.5700
  7. Elgohary, E., & Abdelazyz, R. (2020). The impact of employees’ resistance to change on implementing e-government systems: An empirical study in Egypt. Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 86(6), e12139. https://doi.org/10.1002/isd2.12139
  8. Errida, A., & Lotfi, B. (2021). The determinants of organizational change management success: Literature review and case study. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 13, 184797902110162. https://doi.org/10.1177/18479790211016273
  9. Hardiani, A. D., & Prasetya, A. (2018). Pengaruh Kepercayaan Organisasional dan Kompetensi Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Melalui Motivasi Kerja (Studi Pada Karyawan PT. PLN Persero Distribusi Jawa Barat Area Bekasi). Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis, 61(3), 1–9.
  10. Hart, H., Arjanggi, R., Nugroho, K., & Maerani, I. (2019). Lecturers’ language problems in writing english papers for international publications. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 13, 239–246. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v13i2.11438
  11. Johannsdottir, L., Olafsson, S., & Davidsdottir, B. (2015). Leadership role and employee acceptance of change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 28, 72–96. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-12-2013-0238
  12. Jones, J., Firth, J., Hannibal, C., & Ogunseyin, M. (2019). Factors Contributing to Organizational Change Success or Failure. In Evidence-Based Initiatives for Organizational Change and Development (pp. 155–178). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-6155-2.ch008
  13. Kalman, M., & Bozbayindir, F. (2017). An Investigation of Dispositional Resistance, Change-specific Resistance and Change-Related Information: The Case of the “4+4+4” Educational Reform in Turkey. Multidisciplinary Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 7, p. 125. https://doi.org/10.17583/remie.2017.2622
  14. Kamarul, A. (2019). Factors Influencing Employee Attitudes Toward Organizational Change: Literature Review. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 188–191. atlantis press.
  15. Kutsyuruba, B., & Walker, K. D. (2016). The Destructive Effects of Distrust: Leaders as Brokers of Trust in Organizations. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-366020160000026008
  16. Laihad, A. R., Lengkong, P. K. V., & Saerang, T. R. (2019). Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Menyebabkan Resistensi dalam Proses Perubahan Organisasi di Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Sulawesi Utara, Gorontalo, dan Maluku Utara. Jurnal EMBA: Jurnal Riset Ekonomi, Manajemen, Bisnis Dan Akuntansi, 7(1), 531–540. https://doi.org/10.35794/emba.v7i1.22442
  17. Lay, Y., Ronni Basana, S., & Wiliater Soaloon Panjaitan, T. (2020). The Effect of Organizational Trust and Organizational Citizenship Behavior on Employee Performance. SHS Web of Conferences, 76, 01058. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20207601058
  18. Mignonac, K., Herrbach, O., Serrano Archimi, C., & Manville, C. (2018). Navigating Ambivalence: Perceived Organizational Prestige–Support Discrepancy and Its Relation to Employee Cynicism and Silence. Journal of Management Studies, 55(5), 837–872. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12330
  19. Muluk, M. R. K., & Amelia, A. (2019). Strategi Percepatan Peningkatan Jabatan Fungsional Dosen ( Studi Pada Fakultas X Universitas Y ). Civil Service, 13(1), 47–60.
  20. Oreg, S. (2006). Personality, context, and resistance to organizational change. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 15(1), 73–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320500451247
  21. Oreg, S. (2018). Resistance to Change and Performance: Toward a More Even-Handed View of Dispositional Resistance. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 54(1), 88–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886317741867
  22. Oreg, S., & Sverdlik, N. (2011). Ambivalence toward imposed change: The conflict between dispositional resistance to change and the orientation toward the change agent. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(2), 337–349. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021100
  23. Rahayuningsih, I. (2019). The Positive Impact of Organizational Trust: a Systematic Review. Journal of Educational, Health and Community Psychology, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.12928/jehcp.v8i1.12195
  24. Samah, S. (2018). Recognizing Acceptance of Change and Organizational Support in Public Service Organizations: Engaging Middle Managers in Organizational Change. International Journal of Human Resource Studies, 8, 249. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijhrs.v8i2.12892
  25. Schneider, I. K., van Harreveld, F., Rotteveel, M., Topolinski, S., van der Pligt, J., Schwarz, N., & Koole, S. L. (2015). The path of ambivalence: tracing the pull of opposing evaluations using mouse trajectories. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00996
  26. Schuh, S. C., Van Quaquebeke, N., Göritz, A. S., Xin, K. R., De Cremer, D., & van Dick, R. (2016). Mixed feelings, mixed blessing? How ambivalence in organizational identification relates to employees’ regulatory focus and citizenship behaviors. Human Relations, 69(12), 2224–2249. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726716639117
  27. Thompson, M. M., Zanna, M. P., & Griffin, D. W. (1995). Let’s not be indifferent about (attitudinal) ambivalence. In Ohio State University Series on Attitudes and Persuasion, Vol. 4.Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences. (pp. 361–386). Hillsdale, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  28. Wang, A., & Kebede, S. (2020). Assessing Employees’ Reactions to Organizational Change. Journal of Human Resource and Sustainability Studies, 08(03), 274–293. https://doi.org/10.4236/jhrss.2020.83016
  29. Wong, P. H. K., Loon, M., & Cai, W. J. (2018). Leadership, trust in management and acceptance of change in Hong Kong’s Civil Service Bureau. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 31(5), 1054–1070. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-10-2016-0215
  30. Woodman, R. W. (2017). Reactions to Organizational Change and the Role of Social Context. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2015(1), 14358. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2015.14358symposium
  31. Xu, X., Payne, S. C., Horner, M. T., & Alexander, A. L. (2016). Individual difference predictors of perceived organizational change fairness. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 31(2), 420–433. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-02-2014-0061