The Effectiveness of Intelligent Character Education- Group Format (ICE-GF) to Prevent Student Bullying Behavior

Journal of Educational and Learning Studies August 04, 2020 Volume 3, Number 1 3 authors

Abstract

The phenomenon of bullying in Indonesia is very worrying for the development of teenagers’ life. This study used a quantitative approach with an experimental method. The design used was a pre-experimental one group pretest-posttest design. The data were collected from 33 students as the sample of this study taken by using a purposive sampling technique. The experimental group was divided into 3 groups, namely group A, group B and group C. Each group consisted of 11 members. The data were collected by using a questionnaire students’ BMB3 conditions about bullying (55 valid items = 0.889). Data were analyzed by using the Wilcoxon signed rank test with the help of SPSS version 20.00 to measure the differences between two paired groups on ordinal data. The findings of the study showed that intelligent character education-group format was effective for improving the conditions about thinking, feeling, behaving, acting, and being responsible for the students against bullying so it can prevent bullying behavior.

Authors

  1. Diantifani Harlianda

    Universitas Negeri Padang

  2. Prayitno Prayitno

    Universitas Negeri Padang

  3. Mudjiran Mudjiran

    Universitas Negeri Padang

Keywords

Intelligent Character Education - Group Format (ICE-GF) Bullying

References

  1. Alizamar. (2015). Pengembangan karakter cerdas mahasiswa melalui infusi dalam pembelajaran. Makalah disajikan dalam Seminar Internasional Konseling, Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan UNP, Padang, 13-14 Maret
  2. Arikunto, S. (2010). Prosedur penelitian suatu pendekatan praktik. Jakarta: Rhineka Cipta.
  3. Bauman, S. (2008). The role of elementary school counselors in reducing school bullying. Elementary school journal, 108 (5), 362-375
  4. Bauman, Sheri & Pero, Heather. (2010). Bullying and cyberbullying among deaf students and their hearing peers: An exploratory study. Journal of deaf studies and deaf education, 16 (2), 236-253
  5. Coloroso, B. (2007). Stop bullying: memutus rantai kekerasan anak dari prasekolah hingga SMU. Diterjemahkan oleh: Santi Indra Astuti. Jakarta: Serambi Ilmu Semesta
  6. Hendri, Paul. (2019). Pengeroyokan santri berujung maut. Retrieved Agustus 20, 2019 from http ://www.metroandalas.co.id/berita-pengeroyokan-santri-berujung-maut-kpai-harap-pelaku-dihukum-setimpal.html.
  7. Hertz, M. F., Donato, I., & Wright, J. (2013). Bullying and suicide: A public health approach. Journal of Adolescent Health, 53 (5) 269-279
  8. Magfirah, U & Rachmawati, M. A. (2009). Hubungan antara iklim sekolah dengan kecenderungan perilaku bullying. Jurnal Psikohumanika, 2(1), 2-12
  9. Prayitno. (2015). Konseling integritas (pola konseling Indonesia). Padang: Paramitra Publishing
  10. Prayitno. (2018). Landasan keilmuan dan keprofesionalan bimbingan dan konseling. Padang: UNP Press.
  11. Prayitno dan Amti, E. (2013). Dasar-dasar bimbingan dan konseling. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
  12. Prayitno, Mudjiran, Khaidir, A., Ifdil & Rangka, B. Itsar. (2016). Pendidikan Karakter-Cerdas: format kelompok (PKC-KO) dan format klasikal (PKC-KA). Padang: UNP Press
  13. Priyatna, Andri. (2010). Lets end Bullying: Memahami, mencegah dan mengatasi bullying. Jakarta: Kompas Gramedia
  14. Siegel, S (2008). Statistika non-parametrik untuk ilmu-ilmu Sosial. Jakarta: Gramedia.
  15. Tim KPAI. (2020). Sejumlah kasus bullying sudah warnai catatan masalah anak di awal 2020 begini kata komisioner kpai. Retrieved Maret 22, 2020 from http://www.kpai.go.id/berita/sejumlah-kasus-bullying-sudah-warnai-catatan-masalah-anak-di-awal-2020-begini-kata-komisioner-kpai/