Physical education teacher professionalism: What did the principal say?

Journal of Educational and Learning Studies May 14, 2022 Volume 4, Number 2 2 authors

Abstract

The professionalism of physical education teachers is still low and needs to be improved so that the quality of graduates also improves. This study aims to determine the level of professionalism of physical education teachers from the point of view of the principal's assessment. This needs to be known in order to add insight into the professionalism of teachers from various existing perspectives, so that understanding of teacher professionalism can be more in-depth. A survey study was conducted to examine the principal's assessment of the professionalism of physical education teachers. The population in this study were all public elementary school physical education teachers in Kerinci Regency, amounting to 228 people. The sampling technique in this study used a simple random sampling technique so that 50 people were selected as samples. Data on the professionalism of physical education teachers in this study were collected using a questionnaire. The results of this study indicate that the level of professionalism of the physical education teacher based on the principal's assessment is in the low category. So that physical education teachers, principals, and the government need to make programs so that the professionalism of physical education teachers can increase.

Authors

  1. Jeki Haryanto

    Universitas Negeri Padang

  2. Salvetri Salvetri

    SMPN 28 Kerinci

Keywords

ProfessionalismPhysical Education teacherPrincipal's Assessment

References

  1. Afandi, M., Wahyuningsih, S., & Mayasari, L. I. (2021). Does elementary school teacher performance matter? Cakrawala Pendidikan, 40(1), 242–252. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v40i1.35284
  2. Arsyad, S. azhar. (2013). Kompetensi pedagogikisme guru dalam pembelajaran. Jurnal Adabiyah, 8(2), 203–214.
  3. Asún, S., Chivite, M. T., & Romero, M. R. (2020). Perceptions of professional competences in Physical Education Teacher Education (PETE). Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093812
  4. Bourke, T., Ryan, M., & Ould, P. (2018). How do teacher educators use professional standards in their practice? Teaching and Teacher Education, 75, 83–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.06.005
  5. Dewi, R., & Khotimah, S. H. (2020). Pengaruh Kompetensi pedagogikisme Dan Disiplin Kerja Guru Terhadap Peningkatan Mutu Pendidikan Di Sekolah Dasar. ELEMENTARY: Islamic Teacher Journal, 8(2), 279. https://doi.org/10.21043/elementary.v8i2.7839
  6. Erss, M., & Kalmus, V. (2018). Discourses of teacher autonomy and the role of teachers in Estonian , Finnish and Bavarian teachers ’ newspapers in 1991 e 2010 *. Teaching and Teacher Education, 76, 95–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.08.003
  7. González-calvo, G., & Juan-Miguel, F.-B. (2016). A qualitative analysis of the factors determining the quality of relations between a novice physical education teacher and his students ’ families : implications for the development of professional identity. Sport , Education and Sociaty, July. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2016.1208164
  8. Haryanto, J., Bakhtiar, S., & Damrah. (2021). The performance of elementary school physical education teacher base on principle assessment in kerinci regency. Journal of Educational and Learning Studies, 4(2), 200–204. https://doi.org/10.32698/01722
  9. Marzuan, & Herlina, L. (2021). Kompetensi pedagogikisme Guru Dalam Mentranformasi Pendidikan yang Bermutu Melalui Sistem Penjaminan Mutu Internal (SPMI) Pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19: Studi Kasus di SMP Negeri 13 Oku. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Program Pascasarjana Universitas PGRI Palembang, 207–215. https://jurnal.univpgri-palembang.ac.id/index.php/Prosidingpps/article/view/5607
  10. Mayer, D., & Mills, M. (2021). Professionalism and teacher education in Australia and England. European Journal of Teacher Education, 44(1), 45–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1832987
  11. Mockler, N. (2022). Teacher professional learning under audit: reconfiguring practice in an age of standards. Professional Development in Education, 48(1), 166–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2020.1720779
  12. Qamila, Rukhayati, & Rahman, A. (2021). Pengaruh Keterampilan dan Kompetensi pedagogikisme Terhadap Prestasi Kerja Aparatur Sipil Negara Pada Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Ilmu Keguruan Institut Agama Islam Negeri Palu. Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains, 04(10), 561–565.
  13. Ro, J. (2020). Curriculum , standards and professionalisation : The policy discourse on teacher professionalism in Singapore. Teaching and Teacher Education, 91, 103056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103056
  14. Soenarto, S., Sugito, Suyanta, Siswantoyo, & Marwanti. (2020). Vacational and senior high school professional teachers in industry 4.0. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 39(3), 655–665. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v39i3.32926
  15. Sojanah, J., Suwatno, Kodri, & Machmud, A. (2021). Factors affecting teachers’ technological pedagogical and content knowledge (A survey on economics teacher knowledge). Cakrawala Pendidikan, 40(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v40i1.31035
  16. Soong, H., & Stahl, G. (2021). Negotiating ‘global middle-class’ teacher professionalism: using transnational habitus to explore the experiences of teacher expatriates in Shanghai. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 0(0), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2021.1942295
  17. Sukmawati, S. (2016). Kompetensi pedagogikisme Guru Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Visi Ilmu Pendidikan, 7(2), 1665–1677. https://doi.org/10.26418/jvip.v7i2.17055
  18. Syamsuriyanti, & Sukirno. (2017). Faktor determinasi kompetensi pedagogikisme guru. Harmoni Sosial: Jurnal Pendidikan IPS, 110265(2), 110493.
  19. Syamsuriyanti, & Sukirno. (2018). Faktor determinan kompetensi pedagogikisme guru. Jurnal Kependidikan, 2(1), 56–57.
  20. Vagi, R., Pivovarova, M., & Barnard, W. (2019). Dynamics of preservice teacher quality. Teaching and Teacher Education, 85, 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.06.005
  21. Willegems, V., Consuegra, E., Struyven, K., & Engels, N. (2018). Pre-service teachers as members of a collaborative teacher research team: A steady track to extended professionalism? Teaching and Teacher Education, 76, 126–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.08.012
  22. Yin, H., To, K. H., Keung, C. P. C., & Tam, W. W. Y. (2019). Professional learning communities count: Examining the relationship between faculty trust and teacher professional learning in Hong Kong kindergartens. Teaching and Teacher Education, 82, 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.03.019