The Effect of Cup Size and Diabetes Knowledge on Sweet Tea Consumption: A Quasi-Experimental Study in Indonesia

Jurnal Konseling dan Pendidikan December 30, 2025 Volume 13, Number 4 2 authors

Abstract

Sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) are a significant source of daily sugar intake in the community, with sweet tea being the most popular type of SSB among Indonesians. At the same time, diabetes mellitus ranks third among the leading causes of death in Indonesia. Therefore, greater attention needs to be paid to factors that could potentially reduce SSB consumption, such as package size and diabetes knowledge. Studies examining size-based nudging and diabetes knowledge in relation to SSB consumption are still limited in Indonesia. This study aims to examine size-based nudging (on sweet tea packaging) and diabetes knowledge as factors influencing sweet tea consumption. A quasi-experimental design was used with an effect size of f = 0.25 (medium), α = 0.05, and a power of 0.90, calculated using G*Power 3.1 software. An online questionnaire was distributed to 184 participants, who were asked to select their preferred cup size based on images of regular and jumbo-sized sweet tea cups to simulate size-based nudging. A 23-item diabetes knowledge questionnaire was also used to measure participants’ diabetes knowledge. The results showed a significant effect (p < .001) of cup size on sweet tea consumption, indicating the influence of size-based nudging. However, diabetes knowledge was found to have an insignificant effect (p = 0.971), indicating a knowledge-behavior gap, where higher knowledge does not always lead to healthier choices. This study provides new evidence on nudging interventions for beverage consumption in developing countries, particularly Indonesia, and highlights that size-based nudging can be a practical and low-cost policy tool to help reduce sugar-sweetened beverage consumption alongside educational efforts.

Authors

  1. Zalfa Aisya Zakwa

    Universitas Negeri Semarang

  2. Anna Undarwati

    Universitas Negeri Semarang

Keywords

Sweet tea consumption Size-based nudging Diabetes knowledge Quasi-experimental Knowledge-behavior gap

References

  1. Ahsan, A., Djutaharta, T., Utami, M. G., Pertiwi, Y. B. A., Diniary, A., Amalia, N., Solarin, S. A., & Ramanathan, S. (2025). The Correlation of Caloric Intake from Sugar-Sweetened Beverage (SSB) on Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) Risk in Indonesia. Social Science and Medicine, 372(117956), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.117956
  2. Ardiningsih, E. S., Agushybana, F., & Shaluhiyah, Z. (2025). Key Factors Influencing High Sweet Beverage Consumption During Complementary Feeding Period. Jurnal Promkes: The Indonesian Journal of Health Promotion and Health Education, 13(2), 193–204. https://doi.org/10.20473/jpk.V13.I2.2025.193-204
  3. Cadario, R., & Chandon, P. (2019). Which Healthy Eating Nudges Work Best? A Meta-Analysis of Field Experiments. Marketing Science, 39(3), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2018.1128
  4. Cahyaningsih, I., Rokhman, M. R., Maziyyah, N., Niamuzisilawati, E., Taxis, K., & Denig, P. (2024). Translation and Validation of the Diabetes Knowledge Questionnaire in Indonesian Patients With Type 2 Diabetes. Science of Diabetes Self-Management and Care, 50(6), 484–496. https://doi.org/10.1177/26350106241287445
  5. Dinas Kesehatan Provinsi Jawa Tengah. (2021). Profil Kesehatan Provinsi Jawa Tengah Tahun 2020. Dinkesjatengprov.go.id.
  6. Dinas Kesehatan Provinsi Jawa Tengah. (2024). Profil Kesehatan Provinsi Jawa Tengah Tahun 2023. Dinkesjatengprov.go.id.
  7. Fadhlurrohman, I., & Susanto, J. (2024). Functional Food Innovation Based on Fermented Milk Products with Fortification of Various Types of Tea : A Review. JITIPARI: Jurnal Teknologi dan Industri Pangan Unisri, 9(1), 101–114.
  8. Fadlillah, H. N., Ramadhan, H. S., Hermanianto, J., & Felanesa, L. (2020). Study on Sweetener Selection in Rtd Tea Beverages [Studi Pemilihan Pemanis Pada Teh Siap Minum]. J. Teknol. dan Industri Pangan, 31(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.6066/jtip.2020.31.1.1
  9. Ferretti, F., & Mariani, M. (2019). Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Affordability and The Prevalence of Overweight and Obesity in a Cross Section of Countries. Globalization and Health, 15(30), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-019-0474-x
  10. Garcia, A. A., Villagomez, E. T., Brown, S. A., Kouzekanani, K., & Hanis, C. L. (2001). The Starr County Diabetes Education Study. Diabetes Care, 24(1), 16–21. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.24.1.16
  11. Geier, A. B., Rozin, P., & Doros, G. (2006). Unit Bias: A New Heuristic That Helps Explain the Effect of Portion Size on Food Intake. Association for Psychological Science, 17(6), 521–525. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01738.x
  12. Hieke, S., Palascha, A., Jola, C., Wills, J., & Raats, M. M. (2016). The Pack Size Effect: Influence on Consumer Perceptions of Portion Sizes. Appetite, 96, 225–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2015.09.025
  13. Huang, L., Li, Y., Yu, Y., Zhang, Y., Yu, B., Guo, X., He, H., & Duan, J. (2025). Limited Knowledge, Low Risk Awareness, and Eating Out are Associated with Higher Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Consumption Among Adults Aged 18–64 in Beijing. Plos One, 20(10), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0334416
  14. Hunter, J. R., Oza-Frank, R., Park, S., Sauer, A. G., & Gunn, J. P. (2024). Associations Between Knowledge of Health Conditions and Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Intake Among US Adults, 2021. Nutrients, 16(24), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16244317
  15. International Diabetes Federation. (2025). IDF Diabetes Atlas.
  16. Keller, K. O., & Guyt, J. Y. (2023). A War on Sugar? Effects of Reduced Sugar Content and Package Size in the Soda Category. Journal of Marketing Research, 87(5), 698–718.
  17. Kenkel, D. S. (1991). Health Behavior, Health Knowledge, and Schooling. Journal of Political Economy, 99(2), 287–305. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/261751
  18. Li, Y., Liang, S., Zhang, Y., Li, W., Duan, J., & Meng, L. (2025). Consumption behavior of sugar-sweetened beverages among primary and secondary school students : a qualitative study based on teachers ’ perspectives According to statistics , the global obesity rate. African Journal of Reproductive Health, 29(8), 144. https://doi.org/10.29063/ajrh2025/v29i8s.14
  19. Mantzaria, E., Vasiljevica, M., Turneyb, I., Pillinga, M., & Marteau, T. (2018). Impact of Health Warning Labels on Sugar-Sweetened Bevarages on Parental Selection: An online Experimental Study. Preventive Medicine Reports, 12, 259–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2020.104744
  20. Marchiori, D., Papies, E. K., & Klein, O. (2014). The portion size effect on food intake. An anchoring and adjustment process? Appetite, 81, 108–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2014.06.018
  21. Marteau, T. M., Mantzari, E., & Hollands, G. J. (2025). Do Nudges Need a Regulatory Push? Comparing the Effectiveness and Implementation of Exemplar Nudge (Size-Based) and Non-Nudge (Price-Based) Dietary Interventions. Social Science and Medicine, 373, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118004
  22. Park, S., Lundeen, E. A., Pan, L., & Blanck, H. M. (2017). Impact of Knowledge of Health Conditions on Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Intake Varies Among US Adults. American Journal of Health Promotion, 32(6), 1402–1408. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890117117717381
  23. Nomor 30 Tentang Pencantuman Informasi Kandungan Gula, Garam, dan Lemak, Pub. L. No. 30, Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia 05 (2013).
  24. Prasetia, H., Ameir, A., Setiawan, R., Bardant, T. B., Randy, A., Haq, M. S., Mastur, A. I., Harianto, S., Annisa, N., & Sulaswatty, A. (2020). Studi Pola Konsumsi Teh di Indonesia untuk Mendukung Diversifikasi Produk yang Berkelanjutan. BIOPROPAL Industri, 11(2), 107–118.
  25. Rahmawati, F. M., Pranata, S., & Armiyati, Y. (2025). Unpreparedness In Self-Management: A Description Of Self- Management Of Type II Diabetes Mellitus Patients In Health Facilities. Indonesian Journal of Global Health Research, 7(5), 921–928.
  26. Ren, Z., Hao, Z., & Cao, J. (2024). The association between dietary knowledge based on the Chinese Dietary Guidelines and adherence to healthy dietary habits : a large-scale cross-sectional study. Frontiers in Psychology, 1(10), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1453815
  27. Rimal, R. N. (2000). Closing the Knowledge – Behavior Gap in Health Promotion : The Mediating Role of Self-Efficacy. Health Communication, 12(3), 219–237.
  28. Robinson, E., Oldham, M., Cuckson, I., Brunstrom, J. M., Rogers, P. J., & Hardman, C. A. (2016). Visual exposure to large and small portion sizes and perceptions of portion size normality : Three experimental studies. Appetite, 98(1), 28–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2015.12.010
  29. Sligo, F., & Jameson, A. (2000). The Knowledge?behavior gap in use of health information. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(9), 858–869. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(2000)51:9<858::AID-ASI80>3.0.CO;2-Q
  30. Thakur, S., & Mathur, P. (2021). Nutrition knowledge and its relation with dietary behaviour in children and adolescents : a systematic review. International Journal Adolesc Med Health, 1(2), 1–12.
  31. Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness. Yale University Press.
  32. Tseng, T.-S., Lin, W.-T., Gonzalez, G. V, Kao, Y.-H., Chen, L.-S., & Lin, H.-Y. (2021). Sugar Intake from Sweetened Beverages and Diabetes: A Narrative Review. World Journal of Diabetes, 12(9), 1530–1538. https://doi.org/10.4239/wjd.v12.i9.1530
  33. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, O. of D. P. and H. P. (2010). Health Literacy Online: A Guide to Writing and Designing Easy-to-Use Health Web Sites. In Washington DC.
  34. Venema, T. A. G., Kroese, F. M., Benjamins, J. S., & de Ridder, D. T. D. (2020). When in Doubt, Follow the Crowd? Responsiveness to Social Proof Nudges in the Absence of Clear Preferences. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01385
  35. Versluis, I., Papies, E. K., & Marchiori, D. (2015). Preventing The Pack Size Effect: Exploring The Effectiveness of Pictorial and Non-Pictorial Serving Size Recommendations. Appetite, 87, 116–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2014.12.097
  36. Wang, Y. C., & Vine, S. M. (2013). Caloric Effect of a 16-ounce (473-mL) Portion-Size Cap on Sugar-Sweetened Beverages Served in Restaurants. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 98(2), 430–435. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.112.054833
  37. Wansink, B. (2004). Environmental Factors that Increase the Food Intake and Consumption Volume of Unknowing Consumers. Annual Review of Nutrition, 24(1), 455–479. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.nutr.24.012003.132140
  38. Wansink, B., & van Ittersum, K. (2013). Portion Size Me: Plate-Size Induced Consumption Norms and Win-Win Solutions for Reducing Food Intake and Waste. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 19(4), 320–332. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035053