Development of coaching learning techniques to overcome language errors of elementary students

Jurnal Konseling dan Pendidikan March 10, 2025 Volume 13, Number 1 5 authors

Abstract

This research investigates the systematic development and implementation of coaching-based learning techniques aimed at addressing common language errors among elementary students. Utilizing a Research and Development (R&D) methodology with the ADDIE model framework, this study demonstrates how coaching approaches can transform traditional error correction practices into student-centered learning opportunities. The research findings reveal significant reductions in grammatical, lexical, and phonological errors among participating students, with notable improvements in confidence and self-regulation skills. The coaching techniques developed through this structured process show particular effectiveness in fostering student autonomy and metacognitive awareness, enabling elementary learners to identify and address their own language errors more effectively than traditional correction methods. These findings contribute to the growing body of evidence supporting coaching-based pedagogies in elementary language education.

Authors

  1. Rahmat Kartolo

    Muslim Nusantara Al-Washliyah University

  2. Sutikno Sutikno

    Muslim Nusantara Al-Washliyah University

  3. Sischa Sri Ar Saputra

    Muslim Nusantara Al-Washliyah University

  4. Asnawi Asnawi

    Muslim Nusantara Al-Washliyah University

  5. Sutarini Sutarini

    Muslim Nusantara Al-Washliyah University

Keywords

No keywords available

References

  1. Abrera, E. M., Umbao, E. J. C., Belmonte, M. A. N., Roldan, J., Lasala, A. V., Mirate, T. J. M., & Ocampo, D. M. (2024). Socio-Affective Principle of Language Learning vis-a-vis Speaking Proficiency of English Major Students. Journal of English Education Forum (JEEF), 4(3), 160–173. https://doi.org/10.29303/jeef.v4i3.724
  2. Aslanyan-rad, E., & Ghaderi, M. (2024). Investigating cognitive and metacognitive components of WebQuest-based education in the 7th grade work and technology curriculum according to Shannon’s entropy technique. International Journal of Professional Development, Learners and Learning, 6(2), ep2409. https://doi.org/10.30935/ijpdll/14793
  3. Boiko, A. (2024). Interactive еxtracurricular activities for improving foreign language communicative competence of students of secondary and out-of-school education. Theoretical and Methodical Problems of Children and Youth Education, 28, 43–52. https://doi.org/10.32405/2308-3778-2024-28-1-43-52
  4. Davis, B. J., Bonfils, K. A., Zalzala, A., Lysaker, P. H., & Minor, K. S. (2022). Meaning-making processes across the lifespan: An investigation of the developmental course of metacognitive capacity. Schizophrenia Research, 248, 240–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2022.09.008
  5. Debreli, E., & Onuk, N. (2024). The Influence of Educational Programme on Teachers’ Error Correction Preferences in the Speaking Skill: Insights from English as a Foreign Language Context. International Education Studies, 9(6), 76. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9n6p76
  6. Deng songyuanr. (2025). Study on Internet Language among Elementary School Students. International Theory and Practice in Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.70693/itphss.v2i1.51
  7. Farazandeh, F., Younesi, S. J., & Tarverdizadeh, H. (2023). Effectiveness of learning strategies (cognitive and metacognitive) in the academic identity development among the students. Journal of Adolescent and Youth Psychological Studies, 4(10), 145–155. https://doi.org/10.61838/kman.jayps.4.10.14
  8. Garcia, M., & Amado, R. (2025). Error Analysis in First-Year AB English Language Students’ Written Compositions. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2024.0596
  9. Ghimire, N., & Mokhtari, K. (2025). Evaluating the predictive power of metacognitive reading strategies across diverse educational contexts. Large-Scale Assessments in Education, 13(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-025-00240-3
  10. Ginting, R. P. (2024). An Analysis Of Linguistic Errors In Scientific Articles Of Indonesian Language Education Students. Cerdika: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, 4(12), 1242–1257. https://doi.org/10.59141/cerdika.v4i12.2166
  11. Gumula Rafaelsen, V., Håkansson Lindqvist, M., & Seikkula-Leino, J. (2024). Perspective Chapter: Entrepreneurial Coaching as a Framework for Enhancing Participation and Lifelong Learning in Preschool Education. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.1007433
  12. Ioannou, A., & Retalis, S. (2025). Building entrepreneurial self-efficacy in the EdTech sector: the impact of an entrepreneurship education program. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-12-2023-0234
  13. Jing, H., Xiaodong, H., & Yu, L. (2016). Error Correction in Oral Classroom English Teaching. English Language Teaching, 9(12), 98. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n12p98
  14. Kainulainen, S. (2023). Research and Development (R&D). In Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research (pp. 5957–5959). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17299-1_2482
  15. Khor, E. T., & K, M. (2023). A Systematic Review of the Role of Learning Analytics in Supporting Personalized Learning. Education Sciences, 14(1), 51. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14010051
  16. Kloo, M. (2025). Individual and classroom-level associations of within classroom friendships, friendship quality and a sense of peer community on bullying victimization. Social Psychology of Education, 28(1), 42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-025-10027-7
  17. Mdodana-Zide, L. (2024). Using ADDIE model for scaffolded learning and teaching intervention. Interdisciplinary Journal of Education Research, 6, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.38140/ijer-2024.vol6.28
  18. Mintarsih, M., & Yani, A. (2024). The impact of picture prompts on students’ ability in subject-verb agreement: a classroom action research. IJIET (International Journal of Indonesian Education and Teaching), 8(2), 324–333. https://doi.org/10.24071/ijiet.v8i2.7166
  19. Nageen, S., Hussan, K. H. ul, & Akmal, F. (2023). Role of Teacher for the Successful Implementation Activity Based Curriculum. VFAST Transactions on Education and Social Sciences, 11(1), 94–100. https://doi.org/10.21015/vtess.v11i1.1416
  20. Novak, E., Kuo, C.-L., Tassell, J. L., & Morris, G. (2024). Effects of a Creativity-Enhancement Intervention on Preservice Elementary Teachers’ Creativity in Computing Education. TechTrends, 68(6), 1095–1106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-024-00998-3
  21. Nurfani, N., Rahayu, S., & Priyono, B. (2022). The Relationship of Anxiety, Confidence, and Motivation to the Performance of Volleyball Referees: A Correlation Study. JUARA : Jurnal Olahraga, 7(2), 455–466. https://doi.org/10.33222/juara.v7i2.2038
  22. Orlova, E. (2024). Research and Development (R&D): data analysis and cost-effectiveness. INFRA-M Academic Publishing LLC. https://doi.org/10.12737/1959274
  23. Pani, P., & Handayani, D. F. (2024). Development of affective assessments on student engagement in learning indonesian language. European Journal of Higher Education and Academic Advancement, 1(7), 62–68. https://doi.org/10.61796/ejheaa.v1i7.730
  24. Peris, E., Murillo, A., & Tejada, J. (2024). Design and Implementation of a Musical System for Development of Creative Activities Through Electroacoustics in Educational Contexts. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202409.0297.v2
  25. Prayuda, M. S. (2021). An error analysis on subject-verb agreement in constructing simple present tense made by the second semester students of law faculty. Kairos English Language Teaching Journal, 153–161. https://doi.org/10.54367/kairos.v4i3.1145
  26. Ptushka, A. (2024). Level Characteristics of Foreign Language Communicative Competence Development of Students for Technical Specialties. Educational Challenges, 29(1), 124–134. https://doi.org/10.34142/2709-7986.2024.29.1.09
  27. Purnomo, R., Azizah, S. N., Shofi, A. T., Rahmawan, G. A., Ramadhan, R., Fauzi, M., & Septianto, T. (2025). The Impact of Grammar Knowledge on Student Proficiency in Malaysian Elementary Schools. Cetta: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 8(1), 154–161. https://doi.org/10.37329/cetta.v8i1.3741
  28. Siregar, T., Suparni, Hilda, L., Amir, A., Rangkuti, A., Nasution, M., & Adinda, A. (2024). Research and Development (R&D) Strategy.
  29. Subekti, M. A., Suryadi, S., & Ahmad, M. (2024). Transforming Teacher Performance: The Impact of Training and Professional Development on Competence Improvement. Proceeding of International Conference on Islamic Education (ICIED), 9(1), 218. https://doi.org/10.18860/icied.v9i1.3142
  30. Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Peneltian Kuanitatif, Kualitatif, R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  31. Sun, S., & Fu, Y. (2025). The Role of Mobile Education Technology in Promoting Personalized Learning in Higher Education. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (IJIM), 19(04), 93–107. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v19i04.54217
  32. Torang Siregar. (2023). Stages of Research and Development Model Research and Development (R&D). DIROSAT: Journal of Education, Social Sciences & Humanities, 1(4), 142–158. https://doi.org/10.58355/dirosat.v1i4.48
  33. Wang, Z., Xie, Y., Wang, L., Liu, X., Hu, S., Zhang, L., & Zhang, C. (2024). Applications and Progress of Machine Learning Techniques in the Ladle Furnace Refining Process: A Review. Steel Research International. https://doi.org/10.1002/srin.202400551
  34. Watcharapunyawong, S., & Usaha, S. (2012). Thai EFL Students’ Writing Errors in Different Text Types: The Interference of the First Language. English Language Teaching, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v6n1p67
  35. Zavarukhin, V. P., & Kleeva, L. P. (2024). R&D performance system as a basis for monitoring research and technological development. Economics of Science, 10(3), 52–65. https://doi.org/10.22394/2410-132X-2024-10-3-52-65