Cyberloafing pada mahasiswa: tinjauan demografis berdasarkan jenis kelamin dan usia

Jurnal Konseling dan Pendidikan April 15, 2026 Volume 14, Number 1 3 authors

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis tingkat cyberloafing pada mahasiswa ditinjau berdasarkan jenis kelamin dan usia. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan metode deskriptif. Penelitian ini melibatkan 428 orang sampel dari beberapa perguruan tinggi di Indonesia. Metode pengambilan sampel menggunakan simple random sampling. Instrumen yang digunakan adalah skala cyberloafing yang terdiri dari 24 item dengan lima dimensi. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa mayoritas mahasiswa berada pada kategori cyberloafing sangat tinggi, yang mengindikasikan tingginya penggunaan internet untuk aktivitas non-akademik selama perkuliahan berlangsung. Cyberloafing pada mahasiswa laki-laki lebih tinggi dibandingkan perempuan, dengan rentang usia paling banyak melakukan cyberloafing yaitu 21 s.d 24 tahun. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan perlunya upaya preventif dan intervensi yang sistematis bagi konselor diperguruan tinggi dan pihak terkait untuk menyusun rencana pelayanan konseling guna mereduksi cyberloafing pada mahasiswa

Authors

  1. Febby Nur Reza Hakim

    Departement of Guidance and Counseling, Faculty of Education, Universitas Negeri Padang, Padang - West Sumatera - Indonesia

  2. Ifdil Ifdil

    Universitas Negeri Padang

  3. Annisaislami

    Departement of Guidance and Counseling, Faculty of Education, Universitas Negeri Padang, Padang - West Sumatera - Indonesia

Keywords

CyberloafingJenis KelaminUsiaMahasiswaInternet

References

  1. Akbulut, Y., Dursun, O. O., Donmez, O., & Sahin, Y. L. (2016). In search of a measure to investigate cyberloafing in educational settings. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 616–625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.002
  2. Alizamar, A., Ifdil, I., Taufik, T., Syahniar, S., Afdal, A., Hariko, R., Yendi, F. M., Ardi, Z., Fadli, R. P., Erwinda, L., Zola, N., Suranata, K., Bariyyah, K., & Rangka, I. B. (2018). Measuring internet addiction: Adaptation and validation of the Chen Internet Addiction Scale (CIAS) on Indonesian version. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1114(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742- 6596/1114/1/012057
  3. Anam, K., & Pratomo, G. A. (2019). Fenomena Cyberslacking pada Mahasiswa. Jurnal Psikologi Ilmiah, 11(3), 202–210. http://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/INTUISI
  4. APJII. (2025). Profil Pengguna Internet Indonesia 2025. In Jakarta. https://survei.apjii.or.id/
  5. Baturay, M. H., & Toker, S. (2015). An investigation of the impact of demographics on cyberloafing from an educational setting angle. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 358–366. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.081
  6. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (3rd ed). In Sage Publication (Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2010.09.003
  7. Dinarti, L. K., & Satwika, Y. W. (2022). Hubungan Stres Akademik dengan Perilaku Cyberloafing pada Mahasiswa. Character: Jurnal Penelitian Psikologi Menggunakan, 9(7), 84–95. https://doi.org/ 10.26740/cjpp.v9i7.47977
  8. Dursun, O. O., Donmez, O., & Akbulut, Y. (2018). Predictors of cyberloafing among preservice information technology teachers. Contemporary Educational Technology, 9(1), 22–41. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/6209
  9. Fisher, M. J., & Marshall, A. P. (2009). Understanding descriptive statistics. Australian Critical Care, 22(2), 93–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aucc.2008.11.003
  10. Haikal, M., Zainuddin, S., & Alatas, R. (2019). Study of Internet Utilization on Communication Students of Fisip UNTAD For The 2015 Studi Pemanfaatan Internet Pada Mahasiswa Komunikasi Fisip UNTAD Angkatan 2015. 123–150. http://jurnal.fisip.untad.ac.id/index.php/socialhumanity
  11. Ifdil, I., Amalianita, B., Fadli, R. P., Zola, N., & Putri, Y. E. (2021). The impact of social media access and anxiety among Indonesia society during covid-19 outbreak. COUNS-EDU: The International Journal of Counseling and Education, 6(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.23916/0020200528830
  12. Ifdil, I., Putri, Y. E., Fadli, R. P., Erwinda, L., Suranata, K., Ardi, Z., Fitria, L., Churnia, E., Zola, N., Barriyah, K., & Rangka, I. B. (2018). Measuring internet addiction: Comparative studies based on gender using Bayesian analysis. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1114(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1114/1/012073
  13. Indrawati, L. (2015). Pemanfaatan Internet oleh Mahasiswa dalam Menghadapi Masyarakat Ekonomi ASEAN. Jurnal Bisnis Perspektif, 7(2), 114–153. https://doi.org/10.21009/pip.151.2
  14. Kabasakal, H. Z., & Demir, K. (2022). Investigating the Relationship between University Students’
  15. Cyberloafing Profiles and Life Goals according to Various Variables. Education Quarterly Reviews,
  16. 5(4). https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1993.05.04.635
  17. Karali, F. S., Tosun, S., Sen-Aksut, M., & Kacar-Kutukcu, D. (2024). Determination of cyberloafing level of speech and Language Therapy Department students. Heliyon, 10(10). https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.heliyon.2024.e31068
  18. Li, Q., Xia, B., Zhang, H., Wang, W., & Wang, X. (2022). College students’ cyberloafing and the sense of meaning of life: The mediating role of state anxiety and the moderating role of psychological flexibility. Frontiers in Public Health, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.905699
  19. Lim, V. K. G. (2002). The IT Way of Loafing on the job: Cyberloafing, Neutralizing and Organizational Justice. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(5), 675–694. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.161
  20. Liu, T., & Potenza, M. N. (2007). Problematic Internet Use: Clinical Implications. CNS Spectrums, 12(6), 453–466.
  21. Malay, N. M. (2022). Dampak Positif dan Negatif Penggunaan Internet Pada Kalangan Mahasiswa Kelas A, B, C, Dan D Angkatan 2021 Prodi Pend. Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, Universitas Nusa Cendana. Jurnal Lazuardi, 5(1), 70–88. https://doi.org/10.53441/jl.Vol5.Iss1.72
  22. Nasir, N., Adetya, S., & Yuliana, Y. V. (2023). Dampak Cyberslacking pada Tingkat Pembelajaran Mahasiswa. Journal on Education, 05(02), 4624–4632. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/ 10.31004/joe.v5i2.1191
  23. Ningtias, Y. C., & Magistarina, E. (2023). Hubungan Antara Stres Akademik dengan Perilaku Cyberloafing pada Mahasiswa Universitas Negeri Padang. INNOVATIVE: Journal Of Social Science Research Volume, 3(5), 10054–10062. https://j-innovative.org/index.php/Innovative
  24. Noor, S., Tajik, O., & Golzar, J. (2022). Simple Random Sampling. International Journal of Education & Language Studies Collection, 1(2), 78–82.
  25. Ozdamli, F., & Ercag, E. (2021). Cyberloafing Among University Students. TEM Journal, 10(1), 421–
  26. 426. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM101-53
  27. Ozturk, Y. T., Tiryaki, S. H., Kuscu, K. H., Ozturk, C. H., & Polat, S. (2022). Do University Students Cyberloaf with Their Smartphones in Class? A Descriptive Study. Istanbul Gelisim Universitesi Saglik Bilimleri Dergisi, 16(16), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.38079/igusabder.1041336
  28. Putri, I. G. A. A. T. (2025). Menelusuri Akar Perilaku Cyberloafing pada Mahasiswa: Kajian Literatur. Nusantara: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial, 12(10), 4143–4155. https://doi.org/10.31604/jips.v12i10.2025. 4143-4155
  29. Simanjuntak, E., Fajrianthi, Purwono, U., & Ardi, R. (2019). Skala Cyberslacking Pada Mahasiswa.
  30. Jurnal Psikologi, 18(1), 55–68. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14710/jp.18.1.55-68
  31. Talan, T., & Kalinkara, Y. (2022). An Investigation of the Cyberloafing and Nomophobia Levels of University Students. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 8(2), 430–450. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres.2708
  32. Toker, S., & Baturay, M. H. (2021). Factors affecting cyberloafing in computer laboratory teaching settings. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00250-5
  33. Twum, R., Yarkwah, C., & Nkrumah, I. K. (2021). Utilisation of the Internet for Cyberloafing Activities among University Students. Journal of Digital Educational Technology, 1(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.21601/jdet/10912
  34. Wu, J., Mei, W., & Ugrin, J. C. (2018). Student Cyberloafing in and out of the Classroom in China and the Relationship with Student Performance. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 21(3), 199–204. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2017.0397
  35. Yasar, S., & Yurdugul, H. (2013). The Investigation of Relation Between Cyberloafing Activities And Cyberloafing Behaviors In Higher Education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 83, 600– 604. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.114
  36. Yilmaz, F. G. K., Yilmaz, R., Ozturk, H. T., Sezer, B., & Karademir, T. (2015). Cyberloafing as a barrier to the successful integration of information and communication technologies into teaching and learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 290–292. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.023
  37. Zahra, N. Z., & Fitri, W. (2025). Strategi Perkembangan Teknologi dalam Pembelajaran di Dunia Digital.
  38. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 2(2), 230–234. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.62383/hardik.v2i2.1461