Riba prohibition and social welfare: a socio-legal analysis of islamic economic norms on family and state outcomes

Journal of Educational and Learning Studies August 03, 2026 Volume 9, Number 1 1 authors

Abstract

This study examines the legal implications of usury (riba) on families and the state from the perspective of the sociology of Islamic law. Islamic law regulates all aspects of human life, including economic activities, and prohibits riba because it contradicts the principles of justice and social welfare. The research aims to analyze the relationship between Islamic legal norms concerning riba and their socio-economic impacts on contemporary society. A qualitative approach was employed through the analysis of primary Islamic sources, including the Qur'an and Hadith, supported by relevant academic literature and empirical studies on the effects of usury practices. The findings indicate that riba contributes to social inequality, weakens moral values, reduces family welfare, and creates economic dependency that may threaten national economic stability and sovereignty. These findings demonstrate that the prohibition of riba is not merely a theological doctrine but also a legal and social mechanism designed to protect public welfare. Therefore, greater collective awareness and the implementation of Sharia-based economic principles are necessary to foster justice, social harmony, and sustainable prosperity for both families and the nation.

Authors

  1. Endang Madali

    Universitas Mathla'ul Anwar

Keywords

economic systemfamilysocial welfareusury

References

  1. Ababulgu Abasimel, N. A. (2023). Islamic Banking and Economics: Concepts and Instruments, Features, Advantages, Differences from Conventional Banks, and Contributions to Economic Growth. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 14(2), 1923–1950. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-022-00940-z
  2. Agunbiade, O. O., & Sone, S. M. (2023). Ponzi Schemes as Africa’s Twenty-First-Century Shylocks: Complications in Femi Osofisan’s Love’s Unlikely Lading: A Comedy from Shakespeare and Fires Burn and Die Hard. Africa Today, 70(2), 67–88. https://doi.org/10.2979/africatoday.70.2.04
  3. Al Fozaie, M. T. (2023). Behavior, religion, and socio-economic development: a synthesized theoretical framework. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 241. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01702-1
  4. Alhejaili, M. (2025). Harmonising derivatives with Shari’ah: ethical practices and regulatory insights. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 18(5), 1132–1149. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-03-2024-0163
  5. Almusaed, A., Almssad, A., & Yitmen, I. (2025). Qualitative Data Collection and Management BT - Practice of Research Methodology in Civil Engineering and Architecture: A Comprehensive Guide (A. Almusaed, A. Almssad, & I. Yitmen (eds.); pp. 417–454). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-97393-2_13
  6. Anjum, M. I. (2022). An Islamic critique of rival economic systems’ theories of interest. International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 38(4), 598–620. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOES-08-2021-0155
  7. As-Salafiyah, A., Ali, M. M., & Rusydiana, A. S. (2025a). Beyond Profit: Maqāsid al-Sharī’ah in Islamic Finance Through Partnership Contracts (ʿUqūd al-Ishtirāk) BT - Islamic Financial Markets and Institutions: Challenges, Financial Stability, and Inclusivity (F. Taghizadeh-Hesary, H. Mohd Thas Thaker, M. I. Bhatti, & A. Allah Pitchay (eds.); pp. 175–194). Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-8650-6_9
  8. As-Salafiyah, A., Ali, M. M., & Rusydiana, A. S. (2025b). Beyond Profit: Maqāsid al-Sharī’ah in Islamic Finance Through Partnership Contracts (ʿUqūd al-Ishtirāk. In Contributions to Economics: Vol. Part F858 (pp. 175–194). Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-8650-6_9
  9. Bekkin, R. I. (2020). Muslim Bank as a Historical Category: Creating Credit Institutions for Muslims In the First Half of the 20th Century. Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta, 13(5), 149–167. https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2020-5-74-149-167
  10. Benton, R. (2020). The economic theology of the High Middle Ages. In The Routledge Handbook of Economic Theology (pp. 287–294). Taylor and Francis; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315267623-36
  11. Derri, A. (2025). The Ottoman Sarraf, Public Debt, and Usury Laws: Rethinking Capitalism and Empire beyond Anomalies. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 67(4). https://doi.org/10.1017/S001041752510011X
  12. Djumadi, Syah, A., Hamida, Mujahidin, & Kamiruddin. (2025). Critical Review of Murābaḥah Financing in Contemporary Islamic Banking: A Maqāṣid al-Sharī‘ah Perspective. MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review, 4(2 SE-Articles), 1152–1188. https://doi.org/10.32332/milrev.v4i2.11087
  13. Farooq, M. O. (2022). Islam Compliance, beyond Sharīʿah Compliance: Toward a Broader Socio-Economic Transformation. Arab Law Quarterly, 38(5), 503–545. https://doi.org/10.1163/15730255-bja10121
  14. Furstenberg, F. F. (2019). Family Change in Global Perspective: How and Why Family Systems Change. Family Relations, 68(3), 326–341. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12361
  15. Harahap, Burhanudin, & Risfandy, Tastaftiyan. (2022). Islamic Organization and the Perception of riba (Usury) and Conventional Banks Among Muslims: Evidence From Indonesia. Sage Open, 12(2), 21582440221097932. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221097931
  16. Hübner, J. A. (2025). Economic Justice in the World’s Religious Traditions BT - Religion and Cooperative Economics: Justice in An Age Of Capital And Catastrophe (J. A. Hübner (ed.); pp. 147–207). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-89150-2_4
  17. Hynes, W., Trump, B., Love, P., & Linkov, I. (2020). Bouncing forward: a resilience approach to dealing with COVID-19 and future systemic shocks. Environment Systems and Decisions, 40(2), 174–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-020-09776-x
  18. Kader, H. (2021). Human well-being, morality and the economy: an Islamic perspective. Islamic Economic Studies, 28(2), 102–123. https://doi.org/10.1108/IES-07-2020-0026
  19. Kamal, I. (2025). A revisit to the prohibition of interest-bearing loans, impact of the verses’ clarity and religious authorities’ interventions: a comparison between the three Abrahamic religions. International Journal of Ethics and Systems. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOES-10-2024-0323
  20. Karimuddin, K., Haeqal, M., Efendi, R., Marhadi, M., & Meidina, A. R. (2024). Bank Interest in the Contemporary Era: Problem of Ad’afan Muda’afah Interpretation in Determining Law of Usury. MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review, 3(1 SE-Articles), 43–65. https://doi.org/10.32332/milrev.v3i1.8948
  21. Lim, Weng Marc. (2025). What Is Qualitative Research? An Overview and Guidelines. Australasian Marketing Journal, 33(2), 199–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/14413582241264619
  22. Martina, D., Kustanti, C. Y., Dewantari, R., Sutandyo, N., Putranto, R., Shatri, H., Effendy, C., van der Heide, A., van der Rijt, C. C. D., & Rietjens, J. A. C. (2022). Advance care planning for patients with cancer and family caregivers in Indonesia: a qualitative study. BMC Palliative Care, 21(1), 204. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-022-01086-0
  23. Marwal, M. I., Munir, B., Marwal, M. R., & Ilyas, M. F. (2025). Responsive Law of the National Sharia Council of the Indonesian Ulema Council’s Fatwa on Permissibility of Electronic Money. El-Usrah, 8(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.22373/j7qh3j69
  24. Moawad, A. T. M. K. (2023). The Advantages of Islamic Investment and its Impact on Sustainable Development. Malaysian Journal of Sharia and Law, 11(2), 381–395. https://doi.org/10.33102/mjsl.vol11no2.351
  25. Septyanun, N., Dimyati, K., Setiaji, B., & Basri, M. (2019). The resurgence of Islamic populist: Purification understanding of usury banking in x-banker community-Indonesia. Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control Systems, 11(8), 2760–2769. https://doi.org/https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3500882
  26. Stefanizzi, S., & Lysova, T. (2024). Usury vulnerability: measuring and modelling the phenomenon in Italy. Quality & Quantity, 58(4), 3845–3862. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-024-01841-w
  27. Surur, A. T., Shulthoni, M., & Adinugraha, H. H. (n.d.). Islamic Enonomic Practices in Indonesia: Essece or Symbol in a Muslim-Majority Country in The World. Dialogue and Universalism, 34(2), 239–264. https://doi.org/10.5840/du202434230
  28. Syuhri, S., Asnawi, N., & Djalaluddin, A. (2025). Integrating voluntary religious contributions (nadzar) into interest-free loans (qardh): A case study of BMT Maslahah, East Java, Indonesia. Journal of Islamic Economics Lariba, 11(1 SE-Articles), 77–102. https://doi.org/10.20885/jielariba.vol11.iss1.art4
  29. Waters, H. A. (2018). The financialization of help: Moneylenders as economic translators in the debt-based economy. Central Asian Survey, 37(3), 403–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/02634937.2018.1442317